On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:10:05AM -0500, David Young wrote:
The driver should be converted, however, I don't think that there is
a case for bluntly removing bktr(4),
Yes, I was corrected already (the conversion should go towards video(4)).
But as always, it is about picking the good
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:33:18PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 30.08.11 18:22, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
And why should GENERIC *not* support hardware that is available, works,
and is of use to someone? If GENERIC is to support only the idea of
what an OS should look for some developers, why
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:51:09PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
To address this issue, I think we are slowly moving towards modularized
kernels. So what I said is about drivers and kernel subsystem, that are
not yet available as modules. But modules are still WIP, and I think
there are still a
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:47:51AM +0200, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:39 AM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: rmind
Date: Mon Aug 29 00:39:16 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/kern: sys_select.c
: Jukka Ruohonen
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 6:41 AM Newsgroups:
gmane.os.netbsd.devel.cvs.full
To: source-changes-full-qavaossjccednm+yrof...@public.gmane.org
Subject: CVS commit: src/share/man/man4
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Mon Aug 29 10:41:10 UTC 2011
Modified Files
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 29.08.11 11:38, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: mbalmer
Date: Sat Aug 27 09:28:56 UTC 2011
Modified Files
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:58:32PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 29.08.11 14:53, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 29.08.11 11:38, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
Module Name: src
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:44:09AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
Whether or not available as a module is a good reason for
removing something from GENERIC is a separate topic which I will
not consider in this message.
Fortunately, people can vote with their own work; henceforth all drivers
I
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:18:29AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
Sorry, but this is just plain stupid. I could as well make so my work
won't work in a modular kernel, and we'll have incompatible features.
Of course it will work in non-modular kernels, but you just have to add it
there manually.
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 05:25:04PM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: rmind
Date: Sat Aug 6 17:25:04 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/uvm: uvm_amap.c uvm_anon.c uvm_anon.h uvm_fault.c uvm_loan.c
uvm_map.c
Log Message:
- Rework
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:18:35AM +, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jmcneill
Date: Mon Aug 8 11:18:34 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/x86/x86: tsc.c
Log Message:
If the USE_PLATFORM_CLOCK flag is set in the FADT, it indicates that OSPM
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 07:40:45AM -0400, Jared McNeill wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
We should not really trust ACPI/FADT here. See acpicpu(4) how this is
Why?
Because we (the operating system) know this better than the BIOS writer.
And because this flag is not reliable
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 07:49:42AM -0400, Jared McNeill wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Why?
Because we (the operating system) know this better than the BIOS writer.
And because this flag is not reliable; numerous systems where tsc(9) is
broken miss this flag in my ACPI
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 08:16:43AM -0400, Jared McNeill wrote:
Newer systems with invariant TSC shouldn't set the USE_PLATFORM_CLOCK
flag.
But the do, unfortunately. Again, I have several examples from the field.
- Jukka.
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 06:27:48PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jakllsch
Date: Fri Aug 5 18:27:48 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi.c
Log Message:
As we add a handler for the ACPI fixed feature button events,
ensure
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 12:02:52PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
The current version does what I needed.
But what is that?
- Jukka.
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 02:45:54PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jakllsch
Date: Thu Aug 4 14:45:54 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/i386/conf: ALL
Log Message:
Add coram(4).
Can we get manual pages for these?
- Jukka.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:03:59AM +, David Holland wrote:
In just about every other test suite I've used (which includes some
very large ones with turing complete/scripted test harness programs
and other fancy stuff) there are test programs and test driver
scripts, but all the pieces have
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 04:51:41PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
Log Message:
Note that dup2(2) and dup3(2) may not fail with EMFILE; from PR lib/45148.
What happens if the 'new' file number is above RLIMIT_NOFILES?
It fails with EBADF.
- Jukka.
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:03:10AM +, S.P.Zeidler wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: spz
Date: Tue Jul 5 10:03:10 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/tests/crypto/libcrypto/idea: Makefile
src/tests/crypto/libcrypto/mdc2: Makefile
src/tests/crypto/libcrypto/rc5:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 07:36:15PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
Merge 't_environment' and 't_environment_pth'.
Please undo that change. The point of two different tests was in
particular that one binary is linked with libpthread and the other one
isn't.
Why? I don't see any point in
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 08:34:41PM +0200, S.P.Zeidler wrote:
These tests are not new [...]
Sorry, I misinterpreted.
- Jukka.
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:54:38AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: manu
Date: Mon Jul 4 07:54:38 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/include/rpc: xdr.h
src/lib/libc/include: namespace.h
src/lib/libc/rpc: Makefile.inc
Added Files:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 11:45:24PM +, David Holland wrote:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:22:51PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Modified Files:
src/tests/syscall: t_mknod.c
Log Message:
Remove wrong check.
XXX: Why does this fail on tmpfs but not ffs?
That *should
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 06:50:50AM +, David Holland wrote:
Perhaps if atf were less intrusive...?
What do you mean? I think it needs to be quite intrusive (sandboxing, etc.).
Unquestionably the old /regress-style is not the way to go. Even if you
dislike some parts of the API, already the
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:12:26AM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
3. they are candidates for modifying to work under atf, I have yet to
get the time to do that
4. luke kindly made some gnu autotests for them a while ago
[...]
and if someone was to offer to convert these tests to atf
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:17:31AM +, Adam Hoka wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: ahoka
Date: Tue Jun 28 07:17:31 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/mips/rmi: rmixl_nand.c
Log Message:
follow nand api changes
Some of these changes broke the build.
- Jukka.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:56:33PM +, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: cherry
Date: Sun Jun 26 12:56:33 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/xen/include [cherry-xenmp]: intr.h
src/sys/arch/xen/xen [cherry-xenmp]: hypervisor.c
Log Message:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:11:53AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Log Message:
Move the evaluation of the _PDC control method out from the acpicpu(4)
driver to the main acpi(4) stack. Follow Linux and evaluate it early.
Should fix PR port-amd64/42895, possibly also PR kern/42583, and many
other
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 09:12:46PM +, Iain Hibbert wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: plunky
Date: Sun Jun 12 21:12:46 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/distrib/sets/lists/tests: mi
src/tests/lib/libc/ssp: Makefile t_ssp.sh
Added Files:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:03:20PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Log Message:
Turn warns on for all tests and fix all the bugs.
Thanks for the cleanup.
Now the wscrl-test (lib/libcurses/t_curses) however fails:
http://www.whooppee.com/~paul/amd64-results/1985_atf.html#failed-tcs-summary
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:57:39PM +, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: sjg
Date: Fri Jun 10 23:57:39 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/usr.bin/make: meta.c
Log Message:
size_t on amd64 doesn't like %u, use a cast.
%zu?
- Jukka.
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:24:33PM +, Paul Goyette wrote:
Since nothing actually records or maintains an average sensor value,
remove value_avg from the prop_dict. We can't completely remove it
because there's one driver that uses this field for its own private
purposes, so for now we
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 10:49:49PM +, Adam Hamsik wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: haad
Date: Sat Jun 4 22:49:49 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/tests/lib/libc/stdlib: t_strtol.c
Log Message:
Fix problem with overflowing constant definition
t_strtol.c:95:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:07:12PM +, S.P.Zeidler wrote:
- introduce a limit for the routes accepted via IPv6 Router Advertisement:
a common 2 interface client will have 6, the default limit is 100 and
can be adjusted via sysctl
As usual, can we have these noted in sysctl(7)?
- Jukka.
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 04:53:21PM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
One thing is reorganizing the tests to match the tree structure, but the
other is to move the tests right next to the source
I don't quite understand the latter part. Why is this a bad thing?
I always thought that having a single
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:37:16AM -0700, Cliff Neighbors wrote:
In file included from
/home/cliff/netbsd/NetBSD-current/usr/src/tests/lib/libc/s
tdlib/t_strtod.c:38:
/home/cliff/netbsd/NetBSD-current/build/evbmips64-eb-20110510/dest/usr/include/f
env.h:29:2: error: #error fenv.h is
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:50:08PM +0200, Adam Hoka wrote:
So can we use for (int i = 0; ... ? :p
Hopefully not...
- Jukka.
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 07:57:46PM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote:
Hmm I have already added MKPERFUSE so please revert mine commits or yours :).
Please also document these MKVOODOOS.
I have a gut feeling that half of these won't even build...
- Jukka.
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 01:31:11AM +, David Holland wrote:
The stuff in util/ predates the decision to use a matching directory
structure. It hasn't been renamed because of inertia, I guess,
Ok. That was kind of my supposition too.
combined with cvs issues and perhaps the faint hope we
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 06:28:46PM +, David Young wrote:
Reduces the resources demanded by TCP sessions in TIME_WAIT-state using
methods called Vestigial Time-Wait (VTW) and Maximum Segment Lifetime
Truncation (MSLT).
Can we have the new sysctl nodes documented?
- Jukka.
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 07:44:57AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
I think it actually does, but only at run-time. It will end up counting
as a bogus test program.
Another question: was a conclusion ever reached about the preferred
directory structure for the tests? I've been now following the
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 08:32:21AM +, Paul Goyette wrote:
Log Message:
Also add the Atffile to the sets list
Thanks for fixing this. Too bad we can not test PR bin/43394... ;-).
- Jukka.
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:40:01AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
True, although bin/43394 really describes a wider problem. There is
simply too much magic/voodoo required to keep the build system happy.
Indeed, and AFAIR none of this is really documented, at least in one place.
Trial and error,
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 02:50:55PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
I am not sure this is valid. It could return ENOTTY too for this case
or even EINVAL. The opengroup manual page is not clear. Do you have a
more authoritative source of what it should return in this case?
Indeed I think the
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 08:39:19PM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: rmind
Date: Sat Apr 16 20:39:18 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/kern: uipc_sem.c
Log Message:
- Add nsems_total and track the use of all semaphores (not only named
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 05:16:29AM +, matthew green wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: mrg
Date: Sun Apr 17 05:16:29 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/kern: kern_module.c
src/sys/sys: module.h
Log Message:
add a module_machine, that defaults to machine.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 08:05:13PM +0200, Klaus Klein wrote:
This exhibits something particularly well that's been bugging me for
quite a while about such documentation changes: I think documenting
the implementation's structure layouts in section 3 is wrong, at least
when supposedly portable
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:24:00PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 08:05:13PM +0200, Klaus Klein wrote:
by being that specific, such documentation creates the obligation to
keep the redundant definition in sync.
PS.
If you look what I've written in, say, stdlib(3
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:56:27PM +0200, Klaus Klein wrote:
Just to make it clear again, it's really just the structure
definitions being documented verbatim I'm taking issue with.
I agree with this and Iain's earlier comment about using a wording such as
[...] has at least the following
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:26:40PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:22:17PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
And to use mktime(3), you must know the tm structure.
No, you don't have to. That's the point Klaus is trying to make.
You need to know that certain fields
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 05:45:25PM +, Paul Goyette wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: pgoyette
Date: Sat Apr 9 17:45:25 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/distrib/sets/lists/tests: mi
src/etc/mtree: NetBSD.dist.tests
src/tests/lib/libc: Makefile
Added Files:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:05:19AM +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote:
Adding the following to the testcase header should do the trick:
atf_tc_set_md_var(tc,require.user,unprivileged);
In that case, if run as root, it will lower its privileges to the
unprivileged user _atf before running the
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:05:19AM +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote:
Adding the following to the testcase header should do the trick:
atf_tc_set_md_var(tc,require.user,unprivileged);
In that case, if run as root, it will lower its privileges to the
unprivileged user _atf before running the
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:09:26AM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote:
Skipping them is not the right solution IMO.
I have no strong opinion about this. But to me it seems that these
bugs/tests are really testing an emulator instead of NetBSD itself.
- Jukka.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 04:46:30AM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
- cpu_attach: remove assignment to cpus_running, as primary CPU might not
be attached first, which causes reset (and thus missed secondary CPUs).
Can you explain this a little more?
- Jukka.
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 04:04:53PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
Raise the return value of the match-function of est(4) and powernow(4).
The assigned priorities are now: 10 for acpicpu(4), 5 for est(4) and
powernow(4), and 1 for odcm(4). These are used to pick the preferred driver.
to the
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:53:24AM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
You must not call these interfaces or any kind of MI synchronization
interface, spin mutexes included, with interrupts switched off at the
machine level!
Yes, of course. It was a bug in a code that is not yet used. Already fixed,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:48:43PM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Why interrupts are disabled here? Calling xc_wait() with interrupts
disabled is, at minimum, very expensive, and I would say it is wrong.
Note that xc_wait(9) does not necessary spin - it can block.
Because interrupts
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 04:45:30PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
pretty much unchanged. Feel free to perform benchmarks if you want.
There are also changes to EST in that time window...
This must be a bad joke. The things I did were just simple refactoring.
As you should be well aware of,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:55:07PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Log Message:
Start to derive the percpu(9) (or per-domain) state coordination
mechanisms by parsing the _CSD, _PSD, and _TSD objects by default.
This is quite interesting development affecting the whole x86; the sleep
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:56:04AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Log Message:
Move PowerNow! to the cpufeaturebus.
I tried to be very careful, but please test for any fall over.
- Jukka.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:43:24AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Wed Feb 23 11:43:23 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: GENERIC XEN3_DOM0
src/sys/arch/i386/conf: ALL GENERIC
src/sys/arch/x86/conf
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:34:13AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
in acpicpu_cstate_fadt(). Note that this violates the specification, given:
PBlockAddress provides the system I/O address for the processors
register block. Each processor can supply a different such address
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:45:01AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
well, i dunno about others but i've found that the old modules
lying around tends to fill up space pretty quickly, but ignoring
that problem and looking at recent i386 builds, i see that the
MONOLITHIC kernel set is only 440kb
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 07:19:03AM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
...ignoring [the old modules] problem ...
A _single_ instance of modules on amd64 occupies 11MB
# du -sk dest/amd64/stand/amd64/5.99.46/
11404 dest/amd64/stand/amd64/5.99.46/
#
That's nearly as much as
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 09:58:44PM +, David Holland wrote:
years without being solved. In fact, in general all such discussions
have been shouted down by module advocates insisting without evidence
that no such problems exist -- this is why these problems remain
unsolved and have been
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 05:13:58PM +0100, Matthias Drochner wrote:
2. I don't want tons of modules which I'll never need installed
into my root file system. As it was common in good old times (tm),
my root filesystems are as small as possible. Now, with modules
being added to the
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 02:01:46AM +, Matt Thomas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: matt
Date: Sat Feb 19 02:01:46 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/sys: cdefs.h
Log Message:
Add __CTASSERT(x)
Why can't there be just a single CTASSERT(x)? Alternatively, a
The so-called wakedev code might be broken for a short while.
The reasons are listed below.
- Jukka.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:49:30AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Thu Feb 17 10:49:30 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/acpi
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 07:36:49PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Log Message:
As explained in the new ACPICA documentation, as of ACPICA 20101207, the
_PRW methods are no longer automatically executed as part of the ACPICA
initialization. Refactor and rewrite the wake-device code to account
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:46:48PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
- add some random notes
Basically, KASSERT() should be used for light-weight checks and
KDASSERT() should be used for heavier ones.
Callers should not rely on the side effects of expression because,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:31:27AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
I don't care much about /usr/share/misc/operator, but I do care about
people making changes without discussion, or making changes with too
little discussion, or making changes that go against the consensus of
the discussion.
For
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:16:41PM +, David Holland wrote:
The most important lesson to learn in software is that it's ok to be
wrong and that when you are wrong, the sooner someone notices the
better. We all make mistakes; we all make lots of mistakes, all the
time. (Writing this post was
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:15:27AM +, David Holland wrote:
It's perfectly possible to propose things on tech-userlevel and get
them agreed on. It just requires doing a little more planning up front
to make sure the proposal has clear motivations and benefits and
addresses likely concerns.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:34:23AM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
Why was this removed when there was an active discussion about removing
it where no concensus was reached? This sort of thing where commis
occur before a discussion is finished seems to be occurring more and
more often.
Maybe
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:45:05AM +, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
Log Message:
Add man pages for Xen devices:
pciback.4 xbd.4 xbdback.4 xenbus.4 xennet.4 xpci.4 xvif.4
Presumably these should have gone to man4.x86. But I guess it is too late now.
- Jukka.
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 03:37:05PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Log Message:
Add two sysctls one that does verbose transaction logging and a second one
that disables flushing the disk cache (which is fast but dangerous for
data integrity). From simon a long while back.
Can we also have
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:52:57PM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
1) There is a use-after-free. Hint: TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE().
2) It is not safe; while lock is dropped, the 'next' entry may also
be removed and freed. Hint: have a local list and avoid relocking.
Hmm. 2) implies that the
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:48:49AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Do not queue functions via sysmon_taskq(9) in the pmf(9) resume hooks.
There is a small and unlikely race when the drivers are loaded as modules;
suspend, resume, queue a function, and immediately unload the module
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:51:24PM -0600, David Young wrote:
IMO, we should put the system to sleep by sending a
power-saving/wakeup-latency goal and a set of waking events (e.g.,
keystroke, mouse movement, LAN activity) to the root device_t using
drvctl. To put any smaller set of devices to
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:29:23AM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
Seems reasonable to me. We could have a more featureful binary later,
and just alias zzz(8) to it.
We have ready ioctl-facilities in sysmon's sysmon_power.c. I believe it
was originally intended by the author that MD code should
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 04:54:47AM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
However, the current implementation is simply a text string with no
defined semantics. A back-end is able to set the value, and it can be
retrieved via the POWER_IOC_GET_TYPE ioctl, but otherwise nothing uses
the value.
Sure, I
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 04:42:30AM +, David Holland wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:38:21PM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
A related note: should we provide typeof(3) in the restricted namespace
instead, i.e. as __typeof(3)?
People are more likely to find the page if it's installed
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:30:13PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Tue Dec 21 20:30:13 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/usr.bin/xargs: xargs.1
Log Message:
PR/44259: Aleksey Cheusov: xargs: -r option is supported but not documented
On Fri Dec 17 2010 at 18:11:57 -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: christos
Date: Fri Dec 17 23:11:57 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/time: localtime.c
Log Message:
PR/44248: Antti Kantee: Fix multi-threaded
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 01:38:07PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Log Message:
Provide a re-entrant and thread-safe set of timezone API's that
don't require locking and can operate on user-specified timezones
as opposed to having to alter the environment to change a timezone.
This work was
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:14:05PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Log Message:
There is no harm to add a manual page for the GNU typeof()-construct, given
that it has already crawled into the source tree.
A related note: should we provide typeof(3) in the restricted namespace
instead, i.e
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:16:36AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
Silly question, but why would it go in section 4? Section 4 is
for devices. module(4) doesn't represent any kind of device. Seems to
me that section 7 would be the best place.
Well I guess it went to section 4 as the old
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 04:13:03AM +, Paul Goyette wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: pgoyette
Date: Sat Dec 11 04:13:03 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man4: swsensor.4
src/sys/dev/sysmon: swsensor.c
Log Message:
Enhance the swsensor(4)
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 05:07:05AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Log Message:
Point to module(9) instead of modctl(8).
We really need module(4) (not 9) like lkm(4)...
Agreed. Another question is the ever so terrible sysctl(7). (I think it
should be split, but I don't have a clear plan on how
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 06:43:34PM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
Other than the rather generic description that existed in the older
lkm(4) man page, I'm not sure what we could add. I'm not even totally
convinced that we need to add anything...
In addition to the generic information in the old
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 08:31:43AM +, David Holland wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:07:15PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Add numerous entries from Roland Kammerer.
Some of these are not acronyms: 1337, FSCK, and NOOB are the most
obvious, but perhaps also things like W8 for wait
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:29:46PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Fri Oct 22 21:29:46 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/stdio: ftell.c local.h
Log Message:
implement EOVERFLOW
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 04:03:20PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
not sure exactly what that means here... but maybe acpicpu should
default to blacklisting P4's? for when it becomes a normal driver
that is enabled by default..
Blacklisting based on processor type sounds reasonable, but somewhat
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:36:45AM +, Antti Kantee wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: pooka
Date: Wed Aug 11 09:36:45 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/netinet: ip_carp.c
Log Message:
Use kpause() instead of DELAY() and sleep a minimum of 1 tick.
This is possible
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 04:58:42PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Merge P-state support for acpicpu(4).
Hi.
I'll post this note about conclusions from various informal discussions
regarding acpicpu(4) and CPU power management generally.
In my opinion, it is increasingly evident that we will need
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 07:30:52AM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
Log Message:
Downgrade the currently supported maximum C-state to C1. There appears to be
timer-related interrupt issues also in C2. With C1 it is guaranteed that
acpicpu(4) will not cause any slowdowns due stalled local APIC
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:59:33PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
1. ACPI seems to define cpuids 1..n; we define 0..n-1. Adjust for that
2. My laptop is dual core, but ACPI reports 4 cpu nodes. Instead of
attaching the unmatched ones, make the match fail. Do we want to
attach and do
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:39:08PM +, Quentin Garnier wrote:
When the platform uses the APIC interrupt model, OSPM associates
processors declared in the namespace with entries in the MADT. Prior to
ACPI 3.0, this was accomplished using the processor object's ProcessorID
and the ACPI
101 - 200 of 392 matches
Mail list logo
