Module Name:src
Committed By: hauke
Date: Tue Oct 22 13:19:47 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/shared-core: r128_drv.h
Log Message:
When building r128drm(4), gcc objects to shifting into bit 31 of a
(signed) int. Make sure we are shifting an unsigned
Module Name:src
Committed By: hauke
Date: Tue Oct 22 13:19:47 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/shared-core: r128_drv.h
Log Message:
When building r128drm(4), gcc objects to shifting into bit 31 of a
(signed) int. Make sure we are shifting an unsigned
Module Name:src
Committed By: riastradh
Date: Fri Aug 30 03:34:37 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/shared-core: radeon_cs.c
Log Message:
Delete dead-as-a-doornail-in-a-dead-horse branch.
If dev_priv is null here, you're hosed to begin with, so the ap
Module Name:src
Committed By: riastradh
Date: Fri Aug 30 03:34:37 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/shared-core: radeon_cs.c
Log Message:
Delete dead-as-a-doornail-in-a-dead-horse branch.
If dev_priv is null here, you're hosed to begin with, so the ap
Module Name:src
Committed By: hauke
Date: Fri Aug 2 14:55:57 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/shared-core: savage_state.c
Log Message:
Deal with gcc's "warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]" by adding the missing KNF FALL
Module Name:src
Committed By: hauke
Date: Fri Aug 2 14:55:57 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sys/external/bsd/drm/dist/shared-core: savage_state.c
Log Message:
Deal with gcc's "warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]" by adding the missing KNF FALL
Hi Matt,
This doesn't fix drm2 i915 breakage. Could you revisit this please, since
it's in external/ ?
Thanks,
On 5 September 2014 15:10, Matt Thomas wrote:
> Module Name:src
> Committed By: matt
> Date: Fri Sep 5 09:40:44 UTC 2014
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/extern
On Sep 6, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> This doesn't fix drm2 i915 breakage. Could you revisit this please, since
> it's in external/ ?
>
> Thanks,
>
If I revert, it still won't build. So no.
i915 shouldn't be using enum pipe since it conflicts with struct pipe