Module Name: src
Committed By: tsutsui
Date: Fri Jan 31 18:17:27 UTC 2014
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Switch ews4800mips and newsmips to Xorg server.
There is ~no user of X11R6 Xservers except a few developers on these ports
and Xorg wsfb
Do you have any suggestion without boring work to rename all
#include machine/foo.h lines and expand the machine path
in MI files to ${MACHINE}/include?
I wish that cc/clang supported -isystem:NAME PATH and iquote:NAME PATH
which would look starting at PATH for includes that start with
Sorry that I was lost, but I still believe that
creating-directories-as-make-target is to avoid.
Do you have any suggestion without boring work to rename all
#include machine/foo.h lines and expand the machine path
in MI files to ${MACHINE}/include?
Creating symlinks for stand programs has
On Jan 24, 2014, at 1:16 AM, Izumi Tsutsui tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp wrote:
Do you have any suggestion without boring work to rename all
#include machine/foo.h lines and expand the machine path
in MI files to ${MACHINE}/include?
I wish that cc/clang supported -isystem:NAME PATH and iquote:NAME
On Jan 24, 2014, at 2:16 AM, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Sorry that I was lost, but I still believe that
creating-directories-as-make-target is to avoid.
Do you have any suggestion without boring work to rename all
#include machine/foo.h lines and expand the machine path
in MI files to
You could install them all into /usr/include/arch and make all the
machine/*.h files look like:
#include arch/ # MACHINE # /foo.h
As mrg@ wrote, kernel (and all standalone) builds
should not require installed DESTDIR.
If we install them into OBJDIR dynamically,
I guess we will get another
chris...@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
On Jan 22, 7:29am, m...@3am-software.com (Matt Thomas) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/mk
| I always wondered why we don't use ln -sf=20
| and avoid the race.
That does not work because if the destnation is a directory
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Matt Thomas wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: matt
Date: Tue Jan 21 16:40:24 UTC 2014
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Make MKGCCCMDS default mirror MKGCC. (if MKGCC is no, MKGCCCMDS must be no).
If that's true, then
: CVS commit: src/share/mk
| I always wondered why we don't use ln -sf
| and avoid the race.
That does not work because if the destnation is a directory it will
try to link in the destination directory... (I tried). This is why
I suggested that it needs to be done
Is this all about symlink-to-directory in an OBJDIR, right? My theory
is that directory creation in OBJDIR is all wrong...
Kernel build *should* include static headers in $DESTDIR (#include
foo.h) or generated headers (#include foo.h) IMO.
Sorry that I was lost, but I still believe that
creating-directories-as-make-target is to avoid. Is there any
counter-example (use case) where it should be there?
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Izumi Tsutsui tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp wrote:
Is this all about symlink-to-directory in an OBJDIR,
Is this all about symlink-to-directory in an OBJDIR, right? My theory
is that directory creation in OBJDIR is all wrong...
Kernel build *should* include static headers in $DESTDIR (#include
foo.h) or generated headers (#include foo.h) IMO.
bsd.klinks.mk is used only for standalone programs
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Wed Jan 22 15:19:05 UTC 2014
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.klinks.mk
Log Message:
For now, ignore errors from creating klinks. This is racy and you can get
it to trigger in 1/4 of the builds with -j 40 on a 24 processor
Is this all about symlink-to-directory in an OBJDIR, right? My theory
is that directory creation in OBJDIR is all wrong...
Kernel build *should* include static headers in $DESTDIR (#include
foo.h) or generated headers (#include foo.h) IMO.
the kernel build 100% does not and should not
How about kernel modules?
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:00 PM, matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
Is this all about symlink-to-directory in an OBJDIR, right? My theory
is that directory creation in OBJDIR is all wrong...
Kernel build *should* include static headers in $DESTDIR (#include
How about kernel modules?
exactly the same.
our userland does not have anything useful for building
kernel code. you _need_ the kernel source tree, and it
is bascially self-contained in src/sys (sans the src/common
problem we haven't fixed yet, and config(1).)
this is very much by design.
On Jan 21, 2014, at 5:40 PM, Matt Thomas m...@netbsd.org wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: matt
Date: Tue Jan 21 16:40:24 UTC 2014
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Make MKGCCCMDS default mirror MKGCC. (if MKGCC is no, MKGCCCMDS must be no).
On Jan 23, 3:11am, campbell+netbsd-source-change...@mumble.net (Taylor R
Campbell) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/mk
|Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:15:44 -0500
|From: chris...@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)
|
|On Jan 22, 7:29am, m...@3am-software.com (Matt Thomas) wrote
I wonder if ln -sfh is portable?
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Christos Zoulas chris...@zoulas.com wrote:
On Jan 23, 3:11am, campbell+netbsd-source-change...@mumble.net (Taylor R
Campbell) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/mk
|Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:15:44 -0500
On Jan 23, 12:59pm, uebay...@gmail.com (Masao Uebayashi) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/mk
| I wonder if ln -sfh is portable?
I smell ${TOOL_LN}.
christos
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Christos Zoulas wrote:
On Jan 22, 7:29am, m...@3am-software.com (Matt Thomas) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/mk
| I always wondered why we don't use ln -sf=20
| and avoid the race.
That does not work because if the destnation is a directory it will
try
Module Name: src
Committed By: matt
Date: Thu Dec 5 22:51:08 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Add MACHINES.${MACHINE_CPU} values.
cool. this should be useful. one update:
- you can build sparc64 as sparc.
and can you mention this in
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 06:42:30PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:55:22PM +, Matt Thomas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: matt
Date: Fri May 3 15:55:22 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:55:22PM +, Matt Thomas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: matt
Date: Fri May 3 15:55:22 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Use !empty(MACHINE_ARCH:Mearm*) instead of ${MACHINE_ARCH:Mearm*} !=
Any reason?
In article 20130503174230.gp24...@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk,
David Laight da...@l8s.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:55:22PM +, Matt Thomas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By:matt
Date:Fri May 3 15:55:22 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
On Apr 11, 11:29am, sk...@netbsd.org (Nick Hudson) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/mk
| Does it work? :)
Yes, for me.
| Maybe change the log message?
I already did.
christos
In article 20130321052513.gb4...@britannica.bec.de,
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:48:15PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By:christos
Date:Thu Mar 21 01:48:15 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
Christos Zoulas chris...@netbsd.org
writes:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Thu Jan 17 15:42:59 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.prog.mk
Log Message:
Now that we have separate debug sets, add -g if ${MKDEBUG} is set for
program builds since we
In article 87fw1vob1m@inbox.ru, Aleksej Saushev a...@inbox.ru wrote:
Christos Zoulas chris...@netbsd.org
+.endif
OBJCFLAGS+= ${OBJCOPTS}
MKDEP_SUFFIXES?=.o .ln
Well...
What about DBG?
Now it isn't clear what the difference between DBG, COPTS, and CFLAGS is
at all.
We cannot use
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Antti Kantee wrote:
+# If the toolchain does not know about a file, --print-file-name echoes
+# the input file name (why??). In that case we want an empty string for
+# dependencies to work correctly. Note: do _not_ use TOOL_SED here because
+# this file is used before
On 11.12.2012 00:25, matthew green wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: pooka
Date: Mon Dec 10 20:58:55 UTC 2012
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.gcc.mk
Log Message:
Deal with crti and crtn not present in some EXTERNAL_TOOLCHAIN's. Also,
handle missing crtstuff
On 11.12.2012 00:25, matthew green wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: pooka
Date: Mon Dec 10 20:58:55 UTC 2012
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.gcc.mk
Log Message:
Deal with crti and crtn not present in some EXTERNAL_TOOLCHAIN's. Also,
handle
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:25:38AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: pooka
Date: Mon Dec 10 20:58:55 UTC 2012
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.gcc.mk
Log Message:
Deal with crti and crtn not present in some
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:34:23PM +, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.kmodule.mk
Log Message:
Remove effectively tautological condition.
I object to this sort of change. There are a number of other compilers
we might want to try sometime; all you're
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011, Marc Balmer wrote:
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.lua.mk
Log Message:
Uncomment LUA_DPLIBS processing, but do not auto-include liblua.so,
under the assumption that programs that load Lua modules already have
loaded it.
Regarding this (which I have discussed
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:07:08PM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
Regarding this (which I have discussed with Marc off-list previously), I
think a Lua module should always depend on liblua.so as there will be
calls to functions from there, though I guess Marc is correct that the
binary loading the
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Marc Balmer wrote:
Log Message:
Install new shiny bsd.clean.mk
Thanks. I updated the set lists.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
Done. Please, commit your patch, or I won't be able to enjoy Clang. ;)
Cheers,
Adam
Please back this out. I have a proper patch for this on tech-toolchain.
Joerg
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:08:15PM +, Adam Ciarcinski wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By:adam
Date:
Please back this out. I have a proper patch for this on tech-toolchain.
Joerg
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:08:15PM +, Adam Ciarcinski wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: adam
Date: Wed May 18 13:08:14 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Module Name: src
Committed By: tron
Date: Sun Apr 17 12:54:23 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Don't use --sysroot=/ for host builds as nbhost-mkdep doesn't
understand that option. This should unbreak tool builds.
hmm, i haven't seen this
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:34:26PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
Log Message:
Don't use --sysroot=/ for host builds as nbhost-mkdep doesn't
understand that option. This should unbreak tool builds.
hmm, i haven't seen this problem. what failed for you?
./build -O /path/to/obj -u -U -j 8 -x
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:03:37AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Sun Apr 17 15:03:37 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Revert previous, breaks builds completely (cd /usr/src/bin/test make clean
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 07:04:05PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
You have now broken the tools build again:
=== build.sh command:./build.sh -O /export/scratch/tron/obj -u -U -x
tools
[...]
Some testing revealed that this only happens if you MKDTRACE is
set to yes. So please try this
On Apr 17, 7:04pm, t...@zhadum.org.uk (Matthias Scheler) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/mk
| Can you please fix that?
I made mkdep understand --sysroot but ignore it.
christos
On Apr 17, 9:55pm, t...@zhadum.org.uk (Matthias Scheler) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/mk
| On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 07:04:05PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
| You have now broken the tools build again:
|
| === build.sh command:./build.sh -O /export/scratch/tron/obj -u -U
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 05:41:25PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Sat Apr 16 21:41:25 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Simplify and correct (previous did not work for !defined(DESTDIR)
You are
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 06:45:23PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Sat Apr 16 22:45:23 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Need --sysroot=/ otherwise ld does not find crt0.o and friends.
What exactly
On 10.04.11 23:03, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: joerg
Date: Sun Apr 10 21:03:17 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Use ?: operator to determine when to add --sysroot. Unbreaks clang
bootstrap.
[...]
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:25:50PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
[...] ${[...foo...] :? --sysroot=${DESTDIR} :}
^ ^
:? == ?: operator?
no, see above.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 07:05:04PM +, Julio Merino wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jmmv
Date: Mon Mar 7 19:05:04 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.prog.mk
Log Message:
Always convert PROG to its plural form independently of whether PROG_CXX
is defined
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:38:06AM +0100, Alistair Crooks wrote:
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.prog.mk
Log Message:
add saslc
[...]
I've been left wondering about POLA, and why we're adding LIB*
definitions to bsd.prog.mk - it doesn't seem the right *.mk file for
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:50:04PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: sys.mk
Log Message:
Alpha doesn't need -traditional-cpp for assembler.
Shouldn't that logic be in bsd.own.mk and not sys.mk?
The .S rules are in sys.mk and it is
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:42:46PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Sun Feb 13 00:42:45 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.prog.mk
Log Message:
add saslc
Thanks for looking after libsaslc, and the integration with
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 07:30:00PM +, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: sys.mk
Log Message:
Alpha doesn't need -traditional-cpp for assembler.
Shouldn't that logic be in bsd.own.mk and not sys.mk?
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
On Tue Dec 14 2010 at 01:52:50 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:22:26PM +, Antti Kantee wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: pooka
Date: Mon Dec 13 17:22:26 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk bsd.prog.mk
On Dec 12, 3:14pm, uebay...@tombi.co.jp (Masao Uebayashi) wrote:
-- Subject: make rule of multiple file generation (was Re: CVS commit: src/sh
| (Moved from source-change...@netbsd.org.)
|
| Actually I am interested. You just did not present your solution in
| tech-whatever so I did not have
On Dec 14, 9:13am, uebay...@tombi.co.jp (Masao Uebayashi) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: make rule of multiple file generation (was Re: CVS commit: sr
| | % cd bin/sh
| | % cvs up -D20091201
| | % nbmake-XXX -n sh
|
| Ok, this is fixed now (in bsd.sys.mk). What else is broken?
|
| %
On Dec 14, 11:40am, uebay...@tombi.co.jp (Masao Uebayashi) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: make rule of multiple file generation (was Re: CVS commit: sr
| This has nothing to do with yacc; the rules in that Makefile are wrong.
|
| instead of:
|
| nodes.h: nodes.c
| nodes.c: mknodes.sh
So this is fixed with an additional dependency to force serialization,
or by fixing the script not to re-use the same temp filenames:
nodes.h: nodes.c
nodes.c nodes.h: mknodes.sh nodetypes nodes.c.pat
${_MKTARGET_CREATE}
${SCRIPT_ENV} ${HOST_SH} ${.ALLSRC:S/^nodes.c$//}
On Dec 14, 12:41pm, uebay...@tombi.co.jp (Masao Uebayashi) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: make rule of multiple file generation (was Re: CVS commit: sr
| So this is fixed with an additional dependency to force serialization,
| or by fixing the script not to re-use the same temp filenames:
|
|
Yes, it adds more explicit rules... My vote is to remove it and fix
the Makefiles/scripts that are broken. It is pretty straight-forward.
Now I'm fine with nuking GENCMD and fix rules using .ORDER:. Please go
for it. It'd be also nice if all instances are rewritten to look an idiom,
like:
On Dec 14, 1:09pm, uebay...@tombi.co.jp (Masao Uebayashi) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: make rule of multiple file generation (was Re: CVS commit: sr
| Yes, it adds more explicit rules... My vote is to remove it and fix
| the Makefiles/scripts that are broken. It is pretty straight-forward.
|
| Now
Yes:
% find * -name Makefile | xargs grep -l GENCMD
usr.bin/ktruss/Makefile
% find * -name '*.mk' | xargs grep -l GENCMD
share/mk/bsd.own.mk
Masao
--
Masao Uebayashi / Tombi Inc. / Tel: +81-90-9141-4635
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 11:21:07AM +, Adam Hamsik wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: haad
Date: Fri Dec 4 11:21:07 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
Switch MKLVM to default value to yes. There are only few bits missing and it
would be
Module Name: src
Committed By:uebayasi
Date:Fri Dec 11 08:37:34 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
${GENCMD} is used to generate only one output from file generation commands
which potentially have multiple
In article 26371.1260567...@splode.eterna.com.au,
matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: uebayasi
Date: Fri Dec 11 08:37:34 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log Message:
${GENCMD} is used
In article 26371.1260567...@splode.eterna.com.au,
matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By:uebayasi
Date:Fri Dec 11 08:37:34 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
Log
I had a discussion with dsl@ on source-change...@.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes-d/2009/12/08/msg001261.html
His suggestion was:
arith.h: arith.y
yacc commands
arith.o: arith.h
[ -f ${@:.o=c} ] || { rm ${@:.o=.h}; exit 1; }
On Dec 12, 11:48am, uebay...@tombi.co.jp (Masao Uebayashi) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/mk
| I had a discussion with dsl@ on source-change...@.
|
| http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes-d/2009/12/08/msg001261.html
|
| His suggestion was:
| arith.h: arith.y
${_LDADD.${PROG}}
${_LDFLAGS.${PROG}}
${_LDSTATIC.${PROG}}
${_LDADD.${LIB}}
${_LDFLAGS.${LIB}}
OTOH you can't pass parameters to ${CC}, because in suffix rules make(1)
only
knows the name of ${.IMPSRC} and ${.TARGET}; it's users' responsivility to
Maybe this is simpler:
sidebeach% nbmake-i386 -V MKZFS
yes
sidebeach% nbmake-i386 -V MKZFS MKZFS=no
no
sidebeach% nbmake-shark -V MKZFS
no
sidebeach% nbmake-shark -V MKZFS MKZFS=yes
yes
Masao
Index: share/mk/bsd.own.mk
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 12:45:22PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
Maybe this is simpler:
sidebeach% nbmake-i386 -V MKZFS
yes
sidebeach% nbmake-i386 -V MKZFS MKZFS=no
no
sidebeach% nbmake-shark -V MKZFS
no
sidebeach% nbmake-shark -V MKZFS MKZFS=yes
Yes, indeed. But this will only work if sets.subr actually
checks for this variable, won't it?
Yes.
sets.subr fetches ${_MKVARS.yes} and ${_MKVARS.no} var names:
= MKZFS is in ${_MKVARS.no}
sets.subr agains fetches all values for all var names:
= MKZFS=${MKZFS}
Am I missing anything else?
On Dec,Friday 4 2009, at 6:13 AM, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
Yes, indeed. But this will only work if sets.subr actually
checks for this variable, won't it?
Yes.
sets.subr fetches ${_MKVARS.yes} and ${_MKVARS.no} var names:
= MKZFS is in ${_MKVARS.no}
sets.subr agains fetches all values
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 04:00:00PM +, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: uebayasi
Date: Sun Nov 29 16:00:00 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.subdir.mk
Log Message:
Remove an unneeded test (.if defined(V)) in .for v in ${V} ... .endfor.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 06:43:10PM +, David Laight wrote:
Modified Files:
src/share/mk: bsd.subdir.mk
Log Message:
Remove an unneeded test (.if defined(V)) in .for v in ${V} ... .endfor.
Tested by running build.sh distribution.
Some versions of make error ${V} when V
101 - 176 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
