> >And maybe, in the spirit of "shlib_version", "version_map", or
> >"version_info" or some other name is better?
>
> let's vote!
version_green_lib
In article <20130329032650.gb24...@nef.pbox.org>,
Alistair Crooks wrote:
>
>That's what FreeBSD used (although, admittedly, they also had
>Symbol.map and Versions.def, which we do without).
ok.
>And maybe, in the spirit of "shlib_version", "version_map", or
>"version_info" or some other name is
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:21:41PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20130328151625.9236a17...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
> Alistair G. Crooks wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >Module Name: src
> >Committed By:agc
> >Date:Thu Mar 28 15:16:25 UTC 2013
> >
> >Added Files:
> >
In article <20130328151625.9236a17...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Alistair G. Crooks wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: agc
>Date: Thu Mar 28 15:16:25 UTC 2013
>
>Added Files:
> src/lib/libisns [agc-symver]: Version.map
>
Perhaps calling those "version.map" is better? W
