Hi Roy !
That looks more semantics (the ones I know of - dynamic interface
scanning is one of my NTPd parts)
preserving now.
So far I see no other issues from the pitfalls I know of.
Lets hope our kernel and other SO_RERRORS systems miss any
interface scan worthy events.
Frank
On
On 02/01/2021 23:33, Frank Kardel wrote:
Also the behavior now fully relies in the routing message functionality which
can be disabled
on serious procession errors - at that point the code robustness relies on the
periodic
re-scanning - so I am not sure whether the periodic re-scanning
On 02/01/2021 23:33, Frank Kardel wrote:
Hi Roy !
This may look like a better solution from the interface tracking side.
People have requested being able to disable dynamic interface updates
completely.
This was implemented via the -U 0.
...
This patch seems (by visual inspection) to
Hi Roy !
This may look like a better solution from the interface tracking side.
People have requested being able to disable dynamic interface updates
completely.
This was implemented via the -U 0.
See man ntpd:
...
−U number, −−updateinterval=number
interval in
On 02/01/2021 17:23, Roy Marples wrote:
That's a good point, with this we can now remove that forced sync on a timer
approach.
Does this look ok?
Better patch:
diff -r 9e64cf4881a1 external/bsd/ntp/dist/ntpd/ntp_io.c
--- a/external/bsd/ntp/dist/ntpd/ntp_io.c Sat Jan 02 12:39:33 2021
Hi Frank
On 02/01/2021 09:55, Frank Kardel wrote:
I doubt that the explicit draining is helpful here as it already happens
I was aware of that.
I was just trying to avoid excess timer interface timeouts if we don't get
around to reading the next message in UPDATE_GRACE time.
Let's see what
Hi Roy !
I doubt that the explicit draining is helpful here as it already happens
in the outer loop processing any routing socket input. All that is happening
in the routing messages processing path is to call
timer_interfacetimeout(current_time + UPDATE_GRACE) and
this is robust for
