CVS commit: src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen

2022-12-13 Thread Nick Hudson
Module Name:src
Committed By:   skrll
Date:   Tue Dec 13 12:43:32 UTC 2022

Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen: setjmp.S

Log Message:
Trailing whitespace


To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen/setjmp.S

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.

Modified files:

Index: src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen/setjmp.S
diff -u src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen/setjmp.S:1.17 src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen/setjmp.S:1.18
--- src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen/setjmp.S:1.17	Sat Nov 30 20:20:42 2013
+++ src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen/setjmp.S	Tue Dec 13 12:43:32 2022
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: setjmp.S,v 1.17 2013/11/30 20:20:42 joerg Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: setjmp.S,v 1.18 2022/12/13 12:43:32 skrll Exp $	*/
 
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 1997 Mark Brinicombe
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ ENTRY(__longjmp14)
 	mov	ip, r3
 	ldr	r3, [r0]
 	movs	r2, #(_JB_MAGIC_SETJMP ^ _JB_MAGIC_SETJMP_VFP)
-	bics	r3, r2 
+	bics	r3, r2
 	/* r2 is not the magic but we don't need it since we can't do VFP */
 #endif
 	cmp	r3, ip



CVS commit: src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen

2022-12-13 Thread Nick Hudson
Module Name:src
Committed By:   skrll
Date:   Tue Dec 13 12:43:32 UTC 2022

Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen: setjmp.S

Log Message:
Trailing whitespace


To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen/setjmp.S

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.



Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen

2012-07-12 Thread Reinoud Zandijk
Hi Veleriy,

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:08:46PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
  Log Message:
  On the libc/libgcc clashes cleanup that removed divsi3.o from libc, 
  ARM/evbarm
  was forgotten. This patch fixes it making static binaries possible again!
 
 Please, complete this by moving the .S file out of common into libkern.

IIRC the file was never there; it was reaching over already to common.

With regards,
Reinoud



Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen

2012-07-12 Thread Valeriy E. Ushakov
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 22:08:19 +0200, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:

 On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:08:46PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
   Log Message:
   On the libc/libgcc clashes cleanup that removed divsi3.o from libc, 
   ARM/evbarm
   was forgotten. This patch fixes it making static binaries possible again!
  
  Please, complete this by moving the .S file out of common into libkern.
 
 IIRC the file was never there; it was reaching over already to common.

Right, but now the file is no longer common, so it should be under
libkern, where it's used.  E.g. 

http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2006/04/22/0047.html

-uwe


Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen

2012-07-11 Thread Valeriy E. Ushakov
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 18:24:27 +, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:

 Module Name:  src
 Committed By: reinoud
 Date: Wed Jul 11 18:24:27 UTC 2012
 
 Modified Files:
   src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen: Makefile.inc
 
 Log Message:
 On the libc/libgcc clashes cleanup that removed divsi3.o from libc, ARM/evbarm
 was forgotten. This patch fixes it making static binaries possible again!

Please, complete this by moving the .S file out of common into libkern.

-uwe


Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen

2012-03-21 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:05:36AM +, Hiroyuki Bessho wrote:
 Module Name:  src
 Committed By: bsh
 Date: Wed Mar 21 09:05:36 UTC 2012
 
 Modified Files:
   src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen: _lwp.c
 
 Log Message:
 shut up lint(1)

So the question is still -- how much do we want to uglify our code?

Joerg


Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen

2012-03-21 Thread David Young
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:44:35AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:05:36AM +, Hiroyuki Bessho wrote:
  Module Name:src
  Committed By:   bsh
  Date:   Wed Mar 21 09:05:36 UTC 2012
  
  Modified Files:
  src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen: _lwp.c
  
  Log Message:
  shut up lint(1)
 
 So the question is still -- how much do we want to uglify our code?

Joerg, please make a positive suggestion instead of sniping at
developers in this way.

Dave

-- 
David Young
dyo...@pobox.comUrbana, IL(217) 721-9981