Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Tue Nov 09 2010 at 13:10:02 +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> > David Holland wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:09:39PM +, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > > > Modified Files:
> > > >src/sys/arch/mips/mips: locore_mips1.S
> > > >
> > > > Log Message:
> > > >
On Tue Nov 09 2010 at 22:43:53 +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> > > I'm curious about this too. That code hasn't changed for at least
> > > 14 years...
> >
> > Given that it's only called from ddb, i'm not too surprised nobody has
> > noticed. Now, unless someone argues that the stores should definit
On Tue Nov 09 2010 at 13:10:02 +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> David Holland wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:09:39PM +, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > > Modified Files:
> > > src/sys/arch/mips/mips: locore_mips1.S
> > >
> > > Log Message:
> > > In TLBRead, restore PID before doing the save
On Tue Nov 09 2010 at 13:01:34 +, Julio Merino wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jmmv
> Date: Tue Nov 9 13:01:34 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tests/fs/tmpfs: t_create.sh
>
> Log Message:
> Remove ugly workaround to skip this if unprivileged-user=_atf and just use
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010, Julio Merino wrote:
> Log Message:
> Remove ugly workaround to skip this if unprivileged-user=_atf and just use
> 'su -m' as pooka@ did in t_mkdir.sh. As he says this may still fail if
> root's shell is csh; we need a better solution.
su -m ${user} -c "/bin/sh -c 'your comman
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:46:46PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > Thanks for the extra details. It may be "obvious" with the background
> > info you've now provided, but wasn't from your initial commit message.
>
> Gotta love source-changes-full and nxr.netbsd.org ;)
No, it's not obvious fro
On 11/09/2010 13:54, David Holland wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:46:46PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > Thanks for the extra details. It may be "obvious" with the background
> > info you've now provided, but wasn't from your initial commit message.
>
> Gotta love source-changes
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:49:09PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> I don't have a mips1-specific reference on hand, but my recollection
>>> is that you need *three* nops when messing with cop0 registers for all
>>> effects to flush through.
>> locore_mips1.S doesn't agree with your recollection,
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:20:11PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> >No, it's not obvious from those either, and I'm even familiar with the
> >architecture. This whole thing could have been avoided if you'd
> >written a clear commit message; can you revise the text in CVS to have
> >fewer dangling r
