On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Matthias Drochner wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: drochner
Date: Tue Dec 20 16:38:06 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/compat/sys: rnd.h
Log Message:
allow kernels w/o COMPAT_50 to build
What was the actual problem? Nothing defined by this fil
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Matthias Drochner wrote:
Modified Files:
src/sys/compat/sys: rnd.h
Log Message:
allow kernels w/o COMPAT_50 to build
What was the actual problem? Nothing defined by this file is
supposed to be used in a kernel without COMP
On which mailling list was this change discussed?
Joerg
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:39:36PM +, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: reinoud
> Date: Tue Dec 20 15:39:36 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libc/sys: mmap.2
> src/sys/sys: mman.h proc.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:39:36PM +, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
> Currently the MAP_NOSYSCALLS is only implemented for x86 but other
> architectures are easy to adapt; see the sys/arch/x86/x86/syscall.c patch.
> Port maintainers are encouraged to add them for their processor ports too.
> When this
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 19:22:12 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On which mailling list was this change discussed?
I guess this is for the usermode kernel, which design has also never
been discussed.
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:39:36PM +, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
> > Module Name:s
On 20.12.2011 16:39, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: reinoud
Date: Tue Dec 20 15:39:36 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/sys: mmap.2
src/sys/sys: mman.h proc.h
src/sys/uvm: uvm_extern.h uvm_map.c uvm_mmap.c
Log Message:
Add a MAP_
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On which mailling list was this change discussed?
One thing that jumps out: Should this new code panic in sys_mmap() if it
can't handle a request instead of just failing the request? That seems
a little ... heavy handed.
Please also stick to KNF (#define), especially
Christos Zoulas writes:
> Log Message:
> - Eliminate so_nbio and turn it into a bit SS_NBIO in so_state.
It looks like fstat is using so_pcb offset directly while netstat uses
sysctl to get list of pcbs. systat uses so_snd/rcv. I guess it is
better not to change the layout of struct socket for
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:13:50AM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> > On which mailling list was this change discussed?
>
> I guess this is for the usermode kernel, which design has also never
> been discussed.
Sure, but changes to fundamental APIs are supposed to not only be
discussed to d
hi,
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Tue Dec 20 23:56:29 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/compat/linux/common: linux_socket.c
> src/sys/dev: kttcp.c
> src/sys/kern: sys_socket.c uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c uipc_syscalls.c
> src/sys/miscfs
10 matches
Mail list logo