At Fri, 01 May 2020 15:41:14 +1000, matthew green wrote: > > > .. I mean, if it's a "tuneable" value like this rather than a constant > > > like > > > __HAVE_SLOW_COMPUTER. :-) > > > > I see. I like this feeling. (not strong opinion too though) > > How about you, mrg@? > > works for me. i
Plus to confirm reverting just this commit from today's github copy of current (d5b32e03eac8b05d38a143ee0ec615efb2233201) boots fine on the T480 Thanks On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 00:12, Alexander Nasonov wrote: > > David Brownlee wrote: > > Just another data point - seeing this same panic on a T480
Hi, Have you missed this thread? If the problem requires more time to investigate, could you consider to revert ata change for a while? Thank you. Alexander Nasonov writes: > David Brownlee wrote: >> Just another data point - seeing this same panic on a T480 with the >> latest kernel from
We can setup an equivalence: put as much effort into the SCTP removal proposal as there was for the SCTP introduction proposal. Since SCTP was just dropped in src without any prior discussion, I don't think we need any discussion for removing it.