On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 00:01:25 +0100, Roland Illig wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > lint: in malloc calls, use 'sizeof *ptr' instead of 'sizeof(type)'
> >
> > style says "sizeof(" not "sizeof "
> >
> > * Casts and sizeof's are not followed by a space.
>
> There are several forms of
On 27.03.2021 00:16, Valery Ushakov wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 00:01:25 +0100, Roland Illig wrote:
To me, writing 'sizeof expr' is clearer than 'sizeof(expr)' since
'sizeof' is not a function, same as with 'return'.
Did I misinterpret the style guide in this regard?
We do want it to look
On 26.03.2021 23:18, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article <20210326203108.3a4e5f...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Roland Illig wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
Module Name:src
Committed By: rillig
Date: Fri Mar 26 20:31:07 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/usr.bin/xlint/common: tyname.c
In article <20210326203108.3a4e5f...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Roland Illig wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: rillig
>Date: Fri Mar 26 20:31:07 UTC 2021
>
>Modified Files:
> src/usr.bin/xlint/common: tyname.c
> src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1: cgram.y decl.c err.c
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 01:44:07 +0100, Roland Illig wrote:
> On 27.03.2021 00:16, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 00:01:25 +0100, Roland Illig wrote:
> > > To me, writing 'sizeof expr' is clearer than 'sizeof(expr)' since
> > > 'sizeof' is not a function, same as with 'return'.
>
> There are several forms of writing sizeof:
>
> 1. sizeof expr
> 2. sizeof(expr)
> 3. sizeof (expr)
> 4. sizeof(type)
> 5. sizeof (type)
>
> I thought that the point of the rule you cited was to discourage forms 3
> and 5. Does the rule also discourage form 1, and if so, why?
>
> To me,
