CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2024-05-10 Thread Andrius Varanavicius
Module Name:src Committed By: andvar Date: Fri May 10 20:36:34 UTC 2024 Modified Files: src/sbin/newfs: mkfs.c Log Message: s/superbock/superblock/ in comment. To generate a diff of this commit: cvs rdiff -u -r1.136 -r1.137 src/sbin/newfs/mkfs.c Please note that diffs

CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2024-05-10 Thread Andrius Varanavicius
Module Name:src Committed By: andvar Date: Fri May 10 20:36:34 UTC 2024 Modified Files: src/sbin/newfs: mkfs.c Log Message: s/superbock/superblock/ in comment. To generate a diff of this commit: cvs rdiff -u -r1.136 -r1.137 src/sbin/newfs/mkfs.c Please note that diffs

CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2024-02-21 Thread matthew green
Module Name:src Committed By: mrg Date: Thu Feb 22 02:11:29 UTC 2024 Modified Files: src/sbin/newfs: mkfs.c Log Message: if the window size works but is 0, assume it didn't work and use 80. To generate a diff of this commit: cvs rdiff -u -r1.135 -r1.136

CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2024-02-21 Thread matthew green
Module Name:src Committed By: mrg Date: Thu Feb 22 02:11:29 UTC 2024 Modified Files: src/sbin/newfs: mkfs.c Log Message: if the window size works but is 0, assume it didn't work and use 80. To generate a diff of this commit: cvs rdiff -u -r1.135 -r1.136

Re: CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2023-07-05 Thread Greg Troxel
Taylor R Campbell writes: > Well, what happened is: > > 1. I was drafting posix_memalign and aligned_alloc for libbsdmalloc in >response to the thread about static program size yesterday, and >carefully reading the specs -- POSIX 2018, C11 -- to make sure I >got all the details

Re: CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2023-07-05 Thread Taylor R Campbell
> Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2023 07:03:09 -0400 > From: Greg Troxel > References: <20230705105858.33080f...@cvs.netbsd.org> > > "Taylor R Campbell" writes: > > > Revert "newfs(8): Ensure A divides S before aligned_alloc(A, S)." > > > > C17 lifted this restriction. > > I know we have only two

CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2023-07-05 Thread Taylor R Campbell
Module Name:src Committed By: riastradh Date: Wed Jul 5 10:58:58 UTC 2023 Modified Files: src/sbin/newfs: mkfs.c newfs.c Log Message: Revert "newfs(8): Ensure A divides S before aligned_alloc(A, S)." C17 lifted this restriction. To generate a diff of this commit: cvs

CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2023-07-05 Thread Taylor R Campbell
Module Name:src Committed By: riastradh Date: Wed Jul 5 10:58:58 UTC 2023 Modified Files: src/sbin/newfs: mkfs.c newfs.c Log Message: Revert "newfs(8): Ensure A divides S before aligned_alloc(A, S)." C17 lifted this restriction. To generate a diff of this commit: cvs

CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2023-07-04 Thread Taylor R Campbell
Module Name:src Committed By: riastradh Date: Tue Jul 4 20:40:34 UTC 2023 Modified Files: src/sbin/newfs: mkfs.c newfs.c Log Message: newfs(8): Ensure A divides S before aligned_alloc(A, S). Required by C11 Sec. 7.22.3.1 The aligned_alloc function, para. 2, p. 348:

CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2023-07-04 Thread Taylor R Campbell
Module Name:src Committed By: riastradh Date: Tue Jul 4 20:40:34 UTC 2023 Modified Files: src/sbin/newfs: mkfs.c newfs.c Log Message: newfs(8): Ensure A divides S before aligned_alloc(A, S). Required by C11 Sec. 7.22.3.1 The aligned_alloc function, para. 2, p. 348:

Re: CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2016-09-13 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:50:30 +0100 From:Sevan Janiyan Message-ID: <2d30ad57-2341-3b08-1d78-32b468cd5...@netbsd.org> | I can't seem to find the 4.3BSD-Reno release notes at the moment, but | the convention is interim releases do not count. |

Re: CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2016-09-12 Thread Sevan Janiyan
On 13/09/2016 00:09, matthew green wrote: > that never stopped them being referenced before. infact, the macros > appear know what they mean because it transforms: > >.Bx 4.3 tahoe . > > into: > >The shells file format appeared in 4.3BSD-Tahoe. > > ie, it capitalises and adds the

re: CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2016-09-12 Thread matthew green
Sevan Janiyan writes: > On 12/09/2016 22:02, matthew green wrote: > > wouldn't "09/06/89" put it in 4.3RENO ? from bsd-family-tree: > > > > 4.3BSD Reno 1990-06-29 [QCU], [DOC] > > > > > > .mrg. > > Reno & Tahoe along with 4.1{a,b,c} were interim/beta releases. that never stopped

re: CVS commit: src/sbin/newfs

2016-09-12 Thread matthew green
> Log Message: > Memory File System support appeared in 4.4BSD, implemented as an extension to > newfs(8). So while newfs may have appeared in 4.2BSD, MFS support was later. > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/csrg/sbin/newfs/Makefile?r1=39047=39051 > Adjust HISTORY. > Bump date. wouldn't "09/06/89" put