On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 11:36:34 -0800, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> I find it better to have
>
> MAN+= bar.7
> MAN+= foo.7
>
> Since a grep for 'MAN.*foo' will produce meaningful results
Also good for diffs in the future, e.g.
MAN += f.3
-MAN += g.3
MAN += h.3
vs.
f.3 \
-g.3 \
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 18:09 Taylor R Campbell <
campbell+netbsd-source-change...@mumble.net> wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 02:05:25 +
> > From: Taylor R Campbell
> >
> > > Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 00:23:33 - (UTC)
> > > From: chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
> > >
> > > Yes,
> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 02:05:25 +
> From: Taylor R Campbell
>
> > Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 00:23:33 - (UTC)
> > From: chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
> >
> > Yes, this is indeed a lot better. I prefer though:
> >
> > MAN+= \
> > bar.7 \
> > foo.7
> >
> > It is faster to parse,
> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 00:23:33 - (UTC)
> From: chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
>
> Yes, this is indeed a lot better. I prefer though:
>
> MAN+= \
> bar.7 \
> foo.7
>
> It is faster to parse, involves less typing, whitespace is cleaner.
This one doesn't have the same pattern for
In article <20231123211614.011a1f...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: riastradh
>Date: Thu Nov 23 21:16:13 UTC 2023
>
>Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man7: Makefile
>
>Log Message:
>share/man/man7/Makefile: Split MAN on
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 07:13:44PM +0300, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> May be also drop "The number for SIGFOO is 666." from the text and
> just change list tags to
>
> SIGFOO/666 - Foo
>
> also dropping the parens around the description?
Sure, if you want to do that, you have my blessing :)
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 15:48:23 +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man7: signal.7
>
> Log Message:
> Add signal numbers in overview table.
> They are already in the text, but this way they're easier to find.
May be also drop "The number for SIGFOO is 666."
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 22:12:52 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 02:19:13PM +0300, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:13:36 +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> >
> > > Module Name: src
> > > Committed By: wiz
> > > Date: Tue May 15
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 02:19:13PM +0300, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:13:36 +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: wiz
> > Date: Tue May 15 09:13:36 UTC 2018
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/share/man/man7:
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:13:36 +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: wiz
> Date: Tue May 15 09:13:36 UTC 2018
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man7: intro.7
>
> Log Message:
> Remove Tn.
I wonder why we are doing this? .Tn is small caps in the
On May 6, 1:09pm, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
} On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:16:36AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
} Silly question, but why would it go in section 4? Section 4 is
} for devices. module(4) doesn't represent any kind of device. Seems to
} me that section 7 would be the best place.
}
On May 4, 3:25am, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
} On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 06:43:34PM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
} Other than the rather generic description that existed in the older
} lkm(4) man page, I'm not sure what we could add. I'm not even totally
} convinced that we need to add anything...
}
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:16:36AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
} In addition to the generic information in the old lkm(4) page [...]
Silly question, but why would it go in section 4? Section 4 is
for devices. module(4) doesn't represent any kind of device. Seems to
me that section
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:16:36AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
Silly question, but why would it go in section 4? Section 4 is
for devices. module(4) doesn't represent any kind of device. Seems to
me that section 7 would be the best place.
Well I guess it went to section 4 as the old
Log Message:
Point to module(9) instead of modctl(8).
We really need module(4) (not 9) like lkm(4)...
---
Izumi Tsutsui
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 05:07:05AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Log Message:
Point to module(9) instead of modctl(8).
We really need module(4) (not 9) like lkm(4)...
Agreed. Another question is the ever so terrible sysctl(7). (I think it
should be split, but I don't have a clear plan on how
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, matthew green wrote:
Log Message:
Point to module(9) instead of modctl(8).
We really need module(4) (not 9) like lkm(4)...
don't we need both? one for the in-kernel APIs, and one for how to
the user-kern API works?
Er, yes, we need both.
And we actually have both!
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 06:43:34PM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
Other than the rather generic description that existed in the older
lkm(4) man page, I'm not sure what we could add. I'm not even totally
convinced that we need to add anything...
In addition to the generic information in the old
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:15:28AM +, Julio Merino wrote:
Log Message:
Add the tests(7) manual page, which describes why and how to run the
test suite and how to configure it.
thank you!
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
Module Name: src
Committed By: cegger
Date: Tue Jun 9 13:05:15 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man7: hier.7
Log Message:
X11R6 - X11R7
ok wiz@
R6 is still valid for many ports.
When I back this out, then someone
Module Name:src
Committed By: cegger
Date: Tue Jun 9 13:05:15 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man7: hier.7
Log Message:
X11R6 - X11R7
ok wiz@
R6 is still valid for many
21 matches
Mail list logo
