On 6/6/24 14:06, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jun 06 13:28:47, martinw...@gmail.com wrote:
I now have to add "accessible" which points to savannah.nongnu.org
if they will have us.
Muhahaha, right, put it in Stallman's hands. Ethical my ass.
I too am a little wary of FSF but mostly due to a negative e
Please keep the replies on the list.
On Jun 06 13:28:47, martinw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > See https://gitlab.com/martinwguy/spettro for a simple example
> > So why didn't you set it up at gitlab.org?
> I sought the most ethical and OSS-friendly I could find.
> I now have to add "accessible" which
> So, are you saying that we should move to guthug because ...
No, I am not saying that.
> Your fork was easier to create than mine because you were already
> registered on a site that already carries sox and didn't have to create an
> autonomous organization ...
> See https://gitlab.com/martinw
On 6/5/24 22:55, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jun 05 12:29:03, martinw...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest coordinating with distro maintainers, first
(most notably Debian).
Yes, I'm collecting a list of the 47 different distro maintainers' emails
What 47 distributions are that?
As listed in repology.org, w
On Jun 05 12:29:03, martinw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I suggest coordinating with distro maintainers, first
> > (most notably Debian).
> Yes, I'm collecting a list of the 47 different distro maintainers' emails
> but it's not clear to me what I should say yet, which is important because
> one email t
I suggest coordinating with distro maintainers, first
(most notably Debian).
Yes, I'm collecting a list of the 47 different distro maintainers'
emails but it's not clear to me what I should say yet, which is
important because one email to 47 maintainers and groups costs a huge
amnount of valuab
Hello all,
(Mostly retired) SoX admin here. Just to point out that if it helps, I can add
new admins to SoX here at SF.
Certainly, in the past, SoX has been a team effort.
Just give me a shout if this is needed.
Cheers, Rob
On Tuesday 4 June 2024 at 13:21:43 CEST, Martin Guy
wrote:
I
Martin Guy wrote:
> I am willing to step up as the new maintainer of SoX, to:
> - make a new release of SoX, 14.4.3, including fixes to all known bugs(*)
> and spelling errors but no more
> - after that, open the flood gates to new developments and features towards
> a non-backwards-compatible rel
> On Jun 04 13:21:16, martinw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I am willing to step up as the new maintainer of SoX to
> > - make a new release of SoX, 14.4.3,
> > including fixes to all known bugs(*)
>
> > (*) There are 28 CVEs open against sox-14.4.2,
> > not the 18 that Debian has patches for.
>
> "All
On Jun 04 13:21:16, martinw...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am willing to step up as the new maintainer of SoX
First of all, thank you for offering to do the work.
Personaly, I would wait a bit longer
to see if the current mainteiners answer to
https://marc.info/?l=sox-devel&m=171692594028490&w=2
but I c
I am willing to step up as the new maintainer of SoX, to:
- make a new release of SoX, 14.4.3, including fixes to all known
bugs(*) and spelling errors but no more
- after that, open the flood gates to new developments and features
towards a non-backwards-compatible release 15.0.0
If this cann
11 matches
Mail list logo
