Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Proposal to remove tables: rhn_db_environment, rhn_enviroment

2009-09-08 Thread Michael Mraka
Cliff wrote: >>> Only part of Spacewalk, which use it is rhn_config_macro table, which is >>> AFAIK used only by monitoring. Main server do not use it. >> >> I'm a little confused as to what the purpose of the >> rhn_db_environment and rhn_environment are used >> for? That's crucial question. It

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Proposal to remove tables: rhn_db_environment, rhn_enviroment

2009-09-08 Thread Cliff
Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: 2009/9/7 Miroslav Suchý : I'm working on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476851 Bug 226915 - [ 976930 ] Monitoring failure on Satellite with external db (where db name != db instance name) Which start to be PITA and one solution which comes to my mind is

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] get_hal_smbios() should show error

2009-09-08 Thread Cliff
Michael Kefeder wrote: Hi List we recently ran into some problems with systems whose smbios information with rhnreg_ks was None. Here's our call and the errorlog: # rhnreg_ks --serverUrl=http://spacewalk.ourdomain.com/XMLRPC --activationkey=1-server log: exceptions.TypeError: cannot marsh

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Split of spacewalk yum repo?

2009-09-08 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:41:18AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > We cant easily do this. Without creating a maintenance headache for > ourselves. > mash grabs all the packages from a koji tag and puts them into a repo. > taking > into account inheritance. > > To implement this we would n

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Split of spacewalk yum repo?

2009-09-08 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 11:52:43 am Brandon Perkins wrote: > Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: > > 2009/9/8 Dennis Gilmore : > >> On Friday 04 September 2009 07:33:36 am Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >>> Today, we have both Spacewalk (and proxy) packages together in one repo > >>> with client packages. > >>

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Split of spacewalk yum repo?

2009-09-08 Thread Brandon Perkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote: > 2009/9/8 Dennis Gilmore : >> On Friday 04 September 2009 07:33:36 am Miroslav Suchý wrote: >>> Today, we have both Spacewalk (and proxy) packages together in one repo >>> with client packages. >>> If somebody will install

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Split of spacewalk yum repo?

2009-09-08 Thread Jesus M. Rodriguez
2009/9/8 Dennis Gilmore : > On Friday 04 September 2009 07:33:36 am Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Today, we have both Spacewalk (and proxy) packages together in one repo >> with client packages. >> If somebody will install Spacewalk on RHEL he will get as side effect >> all those client packages (rhnlib

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Split of spacewalk yum repo?

2009-09-08 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Friday 04 September 2009 07:33:36 am Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Today, we have both Spacewalk (and proxy) packages together in one repo > with client packages. > If somebody will install Spacewalk on RHEL he will get as side effect > all those client packages (rhnlib, yum-rhn-plugin, rhn-client-too

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] PostgreSQL Update & How To Get Involved

2009-09-08 Thread Devan Goodwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:38:28 -0400 Cliff wrote: > Devan Goodwin wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > While a bunch of preliminary schema and app stack prep for > > PostgreSQL went out in Spacewalk 0.6 there were a few