Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Patch: 1058431-sw-remove-channel-does-not-rm-ks-trees

2014-02-03 Thread Michael Mraka
Tomas Lestach wrote: % What if I created a custom distribution that reuses the kickstart trees of rhel-i386-server-5 (according to the BZ)? % % Does my kickstart distribution stays unusable after deleting the channel? Hi Tomas, Thanks for pointing it out. I've modified code so files are deleted

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Patch: 1058431-sw-remove-channel-does-not-rm-ks-trees

2014-01-29 Thread Tomas Lestach
rom: "Michael Mraka" > To: spacewalk-devel@redhat.com > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:55:42 PM > Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Patch: > 1058431-sw-remove-channel-does-not-rm-ks-trees > > Dimitar Yordanov wrote: > % Hi all, > % > %I tried t

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Patch: 1058431-sw-remove-channel-does-not-rm-ks-trees

2014-01-29 Thread Michael Mraka
Dimitar Yordanov wrote: % Hi all, % %I tried to fix the problem described in bz1058431 - Spacewalk-remove-channel does not remove the kickstart trees. %You can find my patch enclosed. Hi Dimi, Thanks for your patch. I've reviewed and commited it. Actually I've splitted the change into t

[Spacewalk-devel] Patch: 1058431-sw-remove-channel-does-not-rm-ks-trees

2014-01-28 Thread Dimitar Yordanov
Hi all, I tried to fix the problem described in bz1058431 - Spacewalk-remove-channel does not remove the kickstart trees. You can find my patch enclosed. Dimi -- Dimitar Yordanov Systems Management QA #satellite-qa From 50cd79f0607322aab39a3d34e48dd8712c87eadb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Fr