Hi!
I am wondering what was the reason to make this very awkward change in
1.7 by using URI in "db_name" in the /etc/rhn/rhn.conf other than
"because now our Java can connect different way"?
My opinion on that:
1. This is called *db_name*. So let it be the *name*.
2. This is not called "db_uri"
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:22:56PM +0200, Bo Maryniuk wrote:
>
> I am wondering what was the reason to make this very awkward change in
> 1.7 by using URI in "db_name" in the /etc/rhn/rhn.conf other than
> "because now our Java can connect different way"?
I'm not sure I correctly understand what
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:46:34PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> I'm not sure I correctly understand what you ask about but the
> oracle_get_database_answers
The /etc/rhn/rhn.conf has nothing to do with *Oracle* database at all.
It is *generic* config and database back-end can be even IBM DB2 one
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 03:54:25PM +0200, Bo Maryniuk wrote:
>
> The /etc/rhn/rhn.conf has nothing to do with *Oracle* database at all.
Right, besides providing database type and connect information, which
for Oracle backend turns out to be ... Oracle connection
specification. :-P
> has nothing
