On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 05:57:05PM +0100, Michael Calmer wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, 7. März 2011, 15:49:59 schrieb Miroslav Suchý:
On 03/07/2011 02:28 PM, Michael Calmer wrote:
Hello,
[...]
Regarding patch 0001-implement-updateinfo-Errata-import-5.patch...
It seems to me that it is
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:40:25AM +0100, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
By the way, when I've removed some safechecks to actually see some
erratas being created from
http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/updates/7/i386/repodata/updateinfo.xml.gz
I get traceback
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:31:45AM +0100, Michael Calmer wrote:
is at fault -- at least in that Fedora 7 updateinfo, the version
is not integer. When I've changed the line to
e['advisory_rel'] = 1
things went much better.
Yes, this is the version appended to advisory_name.
Hi,
Am Freitag, 11. März 2011, 11:23:09 schrieb Jan Pazdziora:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:31:45AM +0100, Michael Calmer wrote:
is at fault -- at least in that Fedora 7 updateinfo, the version
is not integer. When I've changed the line to
e['advisory_rel'] = 1
things
on Friday 11 March 2011 Uwe Gansert wrote:
Patch attached.
btw, the attached patch replaced the old:
0001-added-support-for-SUSE-autoinstallation.patch
Sorry if I confused you. I did not mention that in my previous mail
--
ciao, Uwe Gansert
Uwe Gansert
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF:
