This looks like a „simple” parsing error within the “updateinfo.xml.gz” of that
repo. Maybe the information was not written correctly….I don’t know.
What version of SW are you using?
Robert
Von: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com Im
Auftrag von oogiej...@yahoo.com
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Juni 2
Dear All,
I've created a new system (client) with spacewalk 2.4 (satellite 5.6) using
CentOS 7.
>From Spacewalk server I can now managed this client. The registration was ok.
The upgrade is running too but unfortunately the client take not the package
from Spacewalk server but directly from inte
I noticed after SW 2.8, all of the System Groups show as OK in terms of patch
status but they are definitely not. Anyone else notice this?
Thanks,
Matthew Wilkinson | Lead Server Administrator, Unix
___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat
Hello Jérome
You can remove *or just move* the standard .repo files from
/etc/yum.repos.d to another directory, after register on the Spacewalk, the
client will manage this repos, you can enable/disable via cli or just via
webUI *Spacewalk*
Let us know if you have any additional question.
__
Hello Waldirio,
Thanks for your quick replay.
Ok, I've moved all repos from /etc/yum.repos.d.
Now, it seems to be ok, because the *yum repolist all* showed me the list from
spacewalk.
Is there still a way to check it on the client, like logs or so???
Best regards,
J.
___
Hello J
Good to know everything is ok.
Sorry, I didn't follow your question *Is there still a way to check it on
the client, like logs or so???*
Btw to all CentOS machines you can remove the files by default when
registering on the SW, then will be available / visible just the SW repos.
Best
_
Yes, I've also noticed that: it's clearly a "paper-cut bug".
Il giorno mar 12 giu 2018 alle ore 16:37 Wilkinson, Matthew <
matthewwilkin...@alliantenergy.com> ha scritto:
> I noticed after SW 2.8, all of the System Groups show as OK in terms of
> patch status but they are definitely not. Anyone e
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:36:33, "Wilkinson, Matthew"
wrote:
>I noticed after SW 2.8, all of the System Groups show as OK in terms of patch
>status but they are definitely not. Anyone else notice this?
>Thanks,
>Matthew Wilkinson | Lead Server Administrator, Unix
Yes, I also noticed the same thi
Am 12. Juni 2018 20:33:58 MESZ schrieb Paul-Andre Panon
:
>On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:36:33, "Wilkinson, Matthew"
> wrote:
>>I noticed after SW 2.8, all of the System Groups show as OK in terms
>of patch status but they are definitely not. Anyone else notice this?
>
>>Thanks,
>
>>Matthew Wilkinson | L
