[Bug 2862] Port of spamc to Win32 environment

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2862 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1633 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 2862] Port of spamc to Win32 environment

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2862 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1632 is|0 |1 obsolete|

NEW: Spam Discussion Bullitin Board

I'm trying something new. I've started a spam discussion bulliten board system to people to post their koolest code and spam tricks. The site is at: http://spam.ctyme.com Right now it's open membership until people start spamming it and abusing it. Then I'll control access. The BSS has several s

[Bug 2862] Port of spamc to Win32 environment

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2862 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-03 13:22 --- sidney -- you were asking about the OpenBSD code, but I didn't get a chance to reply before vacation. We can't incorporate that, unfortunately, unless the origina

[Bug 996] BUGZILLA: Put very short version of guidelines directly on "Enter Bug" page

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spamassassin- |

[Bug 579] user configs should be read by spamc and sent to spamd

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spamassassin- |

[Bug 2895] New: rawbody description should be explicit about how tests are applied

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2895 Summary: rawbody description should be explicit about how tests are applied Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Bug 2894] Spelling Checker

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2894 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-03 11:16 --- Subject: Re: New: Spelling Checker I have an alternative solution that works. I implemented using Exim filters but the concept is the same. First - you start w

Re: [Bug 2894] New: Spelling Checker

I have an alternative solution that works. I implemented using Exim filters but the concept is the same. First - you start with a lits of words that spamers misspell. The list is spelled correctly. Then - in my case I just look at the subject and the first 100 characters of the message - but SA

[Bug 2868] Add check for valid spelling?

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2868 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additi

[Bug 2894] Spelling Checker

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2894 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2894] Spelling Checker

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2894 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-03 10:50 --- Since many SA users do not always communicate in English (including some English speakers ), it would seem difficult to impossible to use a spell checker without k

[Bug 2894] New: Spelling Checker

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2894 Summary: Spelling Checker Product: Spamassassin Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Co

[Bug 2892] Disregard attempts at Bayes poison

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2892 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-03 10:10 --- Bug #2878 suggests that SA identifies when plain text and HTML are different in multipart/alternative, that would make it futile for the spammers to use the firs

[Bug 2892] New: Disregard attempts at Bayes poison

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2892 Summary: Disregard attempts at Bayes poison Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

[Bug 1010] Email::IsFree is not fully implemented

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-02 21:03 --- Subject: Re: Email::IsFree is not fully implemented Well, we can't really tell until we try it. The theory is that e-mail from free domains is more likely to be

[Bug 2891] qpsmtpd received line

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2891 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-02 20:20 --- Created an attachment (id=1650) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1650&action=view) Insert qpsmtpd rule above the qmail rules --- Yo

[Bug 2891] New: qpsmtpd received line

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2891 Summary: qpsmtpd received line Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component

[Bug 1010] Email::IsFree is not fully implemented

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additi

[Bug 1383] exempt HTML-only Mozilla replies

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1383 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You

[Bug 692] write faster version of TextCat

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You a

[Bug 2887] Use of Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit breaks --log-to-mbox option

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2887 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |normal Priority|P5

[Bug 2890] New: Flag redirects via shopping.msn.com

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2890 Summary: Flag redirects via shopping.msn.com Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5