[Bug 2847] [review] sa-learn doesn't complain if DB_File not installed

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2847 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2114] sa-learn OOMing on many large mboxes

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2114 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-28 11:40 --- sa-learn --nonspam on a 1,100 message mailbox just OOMed my 512MB RAM 1GB swap dual athlon. This is with a new SpamAssassin 2.6.1. --- You are receiving

[Bug 2864] Patch for spamassassin-2.60-1 SPEC for Red Hat 9

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2864 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1636|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|

[Bug 2864] Patch for spamassassin-2.60-1 SPEC for Red Hat 9

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2864 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1636|text/plain |application/octet-stream

[Bug 2864] Patch for spamassassin-2.60-1 SPEC for Red Hat 9

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2864 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-28 12:21 --- please don't compress/archive patches when uploading. text/plain would have been much more useful. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You ar

[Bug 2864] Patch for spamassassin-2.60-1 SPEC for Red Hat 9

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2864 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|2.70|2.62 --- Additional Comments

[Bug 2871] New: RegExp fails to match valid received header in FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2871 Summary: RegExp fails to match valid received header in FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Bug 2871] RegExp fails to match valid received header in FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2871 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-28 12:46 --- Created an attachment (id=1645) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1645&action=view) Spamassassin does not recognize the yahoo received heade

[Bug 2871] RegExp fails to match valid received header in FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2871 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-28 12:48 --- Created an attachment (id=1646) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1646&action=view) patch to delete period from regular expression -

[Bug 2871] RegExp fails to match valid received header in FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|2.70|2.62 --- Additional Comments

[Bug 2802] Issue with sa-stats.pl

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2802 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||2870 --- You are receiving

[Bug 2870] Update to sa-stats.pl

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2870 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||2802 nThis|

[Bug 2856] [review] report_safe_copy_headers should preserve header order correctly for Received

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2856 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-28 19:23 --- Subject: Re: [review] report_safe_copy_headers should preserve header order correctly for Received On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 05:18:48PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

[Bug 2536] vpopmail/qmail code neither warning- nor 100% taint-safe

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2536 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-29 04:30 --- Sorry to be out. I'm back now. I will answer you tonigth after adding code after line 895. cyrille --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are

[Bug 2872] New: 2.61 won't compile with its default rules.

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2872 Summary: 2.61 won't compile with its default rules. Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P

[Bug 2872] 2.61 won't compile its own default rules.

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2872 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|2.61 won't compile with its |2.61 won't compile its own

[Bug 478] TO: header modification

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spamassassin- |

[Bug 2873] New: MultiZIlla should not be labeled SPAM

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2873 Summary: MultiZIlla should not be labeled SPAM Product: Spamassassin Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1

[Bug 2873] MultiZIlla should not be labeled SPAM

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2873 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-29 19:47 --- Subject: Re: New: MultiZIlla should not be labeled SPAM On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 07:54:45PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't know where to put this, but

[Bug 2874] New: X-spam-status score is wrong

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2874 Summary: X-spam-status score is wrong Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.60 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Compon

[Bug 2550] Some tags not supported in subject_tag

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 478] TO: header modification

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2519] Added with add_header _custom_ headers seems to be ignored

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2519 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-29 22:11 --- You did restart spamd, right? --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 2395] Removing custom headers?

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2395 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|2.70|2.62 --- Additional Comments

[Bug 2659] X-Spam-Level off by 1, probably a rounding bug?

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2659 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2799] spamc_B test fails in Windows/Cygwin due to extra cr's in test data file

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2799 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2873] MultiZIlla should not be labeled SPAM

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2873 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-29 22:39 --- Sure, sounds fair to me. I will ask him to send it to me, or mail me the link. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the

[Bug 2519] Added with add_header _custom_ headers seems to be ignored

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2519 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 00:27 --- Yes :-), I done it... I'll re-test 2.61 after holydays --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching th

[Bug 2311] False positives from MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2311 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2569] MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT triggers too easily

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2569 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additi

[Bug 2569] MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT triggers too easily

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2569 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 01:33 --- Example from Bug 2311: Received: from mta426.mail.yahoo.com (mta426.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.81]) by ResonatorSoft.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h7C

[Bug 2875] New: Two tests to match common spam

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2875 Summary: Two tests to match common spam Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Com

[Bug 2876] New: Fake reply detection

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2876 Summary: Fake reply detection Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

[Bug 2874] X-spam-status score is wrong

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2874 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2860] Possible bug in DYNABLOCK rules?

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2860 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 09:04 --- Further information - I believe in my case it was actually AWL that brought the message above the threshold. After removing relevant entries from the whitelist,

[Bug 2875] Two tests to match common spam

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2875 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 09:29 --- I see a lot of these spams too. They are caught by my Bayesian, though. Clearly the random words are intended to confuse bayes, but if you've trained it well with

[Bug 2877] New: Bogus SGML end tags

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2877 Summary: Bogus SGML end tags Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Compon

[Bug 2878] New: Identify when plain text and HTML are different in multipart/alternative

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2878 Summary: Identify when plain text and HTML are different in multipart/alternative Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Bug 2875] Lot of mPOP generated spam not matched: new rules included

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2875 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Two tests to match common |Lot of mPOP generated spam

[Bug 2879] New: mPOP Web-Mail seems to be a spam tool

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2879 Summary: mPOP Web-Mail seems to be a spam tool Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.60 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 2879] mPOP Web-Mail seems to be a spam tool

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2879 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 14:27 --- mPOP Web-Mail does have some legitimate users, as you can see at http://www.gnu-pascal.de/crystal/gpc/en/raw-mail7003.html It does look like a lot of the recent

[Bug 2880] New: received from does not match DNS

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2880 Summary: received from does not match DNS Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.60 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 2879] mPOP Web-Mail seems to be a spam tool

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2879 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2875] Lot of mPOP generated spam not matched: new rules included

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2875 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additi

[Bug 2875] Lot of mPOP generated spam not matched: new rules included

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2875 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 16:24 --- In bug 2879, Sidney said: | mPOP Web-Mail does have some legitimate users, as you can see at | | http://www.gnu-pascal.de/crystal/gpc/en/raw-mail7003.html |

[Bug 2875] Lot of mPOP generated spam not matched: new rules included

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2875 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 16:36 --- These domains: 2004hosting.net e-hostzz.net 53x.com are all registered to the same entity, and the whois information is meaningless. Seems to have been

[Bug 478] TO: header modification

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 17:31 --- Duncan, you're my hero :) --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 478] TO: header modification

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 17:57 --- Subject: Re: TO: header modification > Duncan, you're my hero :) Aww... Thanks! But I did steal a lot of stuff from your patches :-) --- You are receivin

[Bug 2875] Lot of mPOP generated spam not matched: new rules included

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2875 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 19:33 --- See the messages on SA-Talk with "Ruleset for RND UC CHAR spam" in the subject. Another feature is that the text/plain body has 3 lines of real lowercase words, n

[Bug 2875] Lot of mPOP generated spam not matched: new rules included

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2875 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 19:36 --- Additional domains seen in the body: 2004hosting.org 53x.net --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or ar

[Bug 2875] Lot of mPOP generated spam not matched: new rules included

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2875 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-30 23:31 --- I wonder if the spammer behind these is subscribed to this mailing list... I just got a new one with the typical three lines of random words, but this time it said

[Bug 2875] Lot of mPOP generated spam not matched: new rules included

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2875 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-31 03:59 --- From my personal spam archive. Note: - In headers, it says: "Full Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >" (with a space before the last >) - Use of %RND_UC_CHAR[2-8], I sugg

[Bug 2881] New: bad Makefile produced

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881 Summary: bad Makefile produced Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: Bu

[Bug 2881] bad Makefile produced

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spamassassin- |

[Bug 2608] HABEAS_SWE fails with out of order headers

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2608 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-31 04:32 --- Dan told me in PM that the line breaks really aren't relevant, so I'd go and commit my patch if it is +1'd. --- You are receiving this mail because: -

[Bug 2881] bad Makefile produced

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-31 04:38 --- Here's the output of 'perl Makefile.PL': $ perl Makefile.PL What email address or URL should be used in the suspected-spam report text for users who want more inf

[Bug 2881] bad Makefile produced

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-31 04:40 --- perl -V output: $ perl -V Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 8 subversion 0) configuration: Platform: osname=linux, osvers=2.4.21-1.1931.2.382.entsmp

[Bug 2881] bad Makefile produced

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-31 04:46 --- Created an attachment (id=1647) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1647&action=view) Makefile generated by 'perl Makefile.PL' make first com

[Bug 2307] TRACKER_ID is no good with German

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2307 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-31 07:20 --- Ferdinand Goldmann reported [1] another one: Verwendungsnachweisformular He mentioned two other unspecified words. Wolfram noticed that there were at least tw

[Bug 2881] bad Makefile produced

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2882] New: Sa-learn ham bug!

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2882 Summary: Sa-learn ham bug! Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.60 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: Lea

[Bug 2881] bad Makefile produced

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://wiki.spamassassin.org

[Bug 2882] Sa-learn ham bug!

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2882 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2549] Spam should not be autolearned as ham

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2549 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additi

[Bug 2827] [review] SA fails with 'Argument "" isn't numeric' runtime error

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2827 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-31 07:58 --- +1 for 1639 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 2608] HABEAS_SWE fails with out of order headers

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2608 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-31 09:12 --- +1 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 2875] Lot of mPOP generated spam not matched: new rules included

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2875 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-31 10:42 --- Jeroen, the J_OBFUSCATING_SGML does not appear on any of my mPOP spam and was probably a limited characteristic. Sidney, I see lots of spam coming in with bogus

[Bug 2883] New: lines of whitespace in the mail headers

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2883 Summary: lines of whitespace in the mail headers Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.60 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 2884] New: Not parsed as spam: Not caught

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2884 Summary: Not parsed as spam: Not caught Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.60 Platform: Other URL: Email OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 2885] New: spamc.1 is not built correctly

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2885 Summary: spamc.1 is not built correctly Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: All OS/Version: OpenBSD Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 C

[Bug 2870] Update to sa-stats.pl

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2870 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-01 16:59 --- I just tried this and it doesn't work at all for me right now because of New Year's, it seems. Parse::Syslog really doesnt handle dates very well, especially when

[Bug 2870] Update to sa-stats.pl

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2870 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2802] Issue with sa-stats.pl

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2802 Bug 2802 depends on bug 2870, which changed state. Bug 2870 Summary: Update to sa-stats.pl http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2870 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug 2802] Issue with sa-stats.pl

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2802 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 810] enh req: option for --loghits-style output in report

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=810 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2607] Fixing "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0"

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2607 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://wiki.spamassassin.org

[Bug 2659] X-Spam-Level off by 1, probably a rounding bug?

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2659 Bug 2659 depends on bug 2607, which changed state. Bug 2607 Summary: Fixing "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0" http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2607 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug 2750] Allow placing _LOGSTARS_ in subject line

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2750 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Allow placing stars in |Allow placing _LOGSTARS_ in

[Bug 195] DBs (AWL, Bayes) ought to be able to be put into an SQL Database

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1461 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 195] DBs (AWL, Bayes) ought to be able to be put into an SQL Database

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1462 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 2887] New: Use of Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit breaks --log-to-mbox option

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2887 Summary: Use of Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit breaks --log-to- mbox option Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-01 19:00 --- Hmmm... unfortunately we can not accept this patch without having a CLA on file. Could you please fill out the form available below: http://www.apache.org/license

[Bug 2787] [review] Type of received line misunderstood

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2787 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug 2787] [review] Type of received line misunderstood

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2787 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-01 19:25 --- Created an attachment (id=1648) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1648&action=view) Insert my new rule above the Content Technologies rule

[Bug 2787] [reopened] Type of received line misunderstood

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2787 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[review] Type of received |[reopened] Type of received

[Bug 2862] Port of spamc to Win32 environment

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2862 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You

[Bug 2888] New: Spamhaus releases XBL

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2888 Summary: Spamhaus releases XBL Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: All URL: http://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: e

[Bug 2889] New: Spamhaus XBL Exploits Blocklist

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2889 Summary: Spamhaus XBL Exploits Blocklist Product: Spamassassin Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 2889] Spamhaus XBL Exploits Blocklist

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2889 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-02 10:10 --- Created an attachment (id=1649) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1649&action=view) Patch v. 1.0 My first attempt at writing a patch for Sp

[Bug 2889] Spamhaus XBL Exploits Blocklist

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2889 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement OS/Version|oth

[Bug 2812] New Rule - Yahoo Redirect Links

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2812 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-02 10:53 --- I've also been seeing Yahoo redirects for the form http://drs.yahoo.com/stubbly/vulgaritymyself/*http://www.cdatlow.com/foryou/ note the "drs" rather than "rd" h

[Bug 2888] Spamhaus releases XBL

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2888 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2889] Spamhaus XBL Exploits Blocklist

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2889 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additi

[Bug 2890] New: Flag redirects via shopping.msn.com

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2890 Summary: Flag redirects via shopping.msn.com Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 2887] Use of Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit breaks --log-to-mbox option

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2887 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |normal Priority|P5

[Bug 692] write faster version of TextCat

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You a

[Bug 1383] exempt HTML-only Mozilla replies

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1383 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You

[Bug 1010] Email::IsFree is not fully implemented

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additi

[Bug 2891] New: qpsmtpd received line

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2891 Summary: qpsmtpd received line Product: Spamassassin Version: 2.61 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >