Re: [SAtalk] FW: [expert] Spamassassin + CommuniGate Pro config

2003-01-12 Thread John Rudd
On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 22:22 US/Pacific, Brian York wrote: If anyone is using spamassassinwith CommuniGate Protogether would someone please send me some configuration filesor some a howto on getting them to work. If they go in more than one place zip them in the file structure in the plac

Re: [SAtalk] My posting

2003-01-12 Thread Tony L. Svanstrom
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 the voices made Nick Marino write: NM> So for that I appologize. But when someone is learning and trying to NM> understand new things please don't be so rude when you respond to them you NM> are more than likely to get a rude response back. Just take a look at what you've wri

[SAtalk] FW: [expert] Spamassassin + CommuniGate Pro config

2003-01-12 Thread Brian York
    -Original Message- From: Brian York [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:12 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'RedHat Psyce list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])' Subject: [expert] Spamassassin + CommuniGate Pro config   If anyone is using spamassassin with CommuniGat

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassasin corupting email. This is directed to tony@svanstrom.com

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
> Everyone take a deep breath... Ok now that I've had my lesson in email etiqutte I'll just go shoot myself in the head. Come on people its only an email message not a novel. I can understand the comment about not supplying good or enough information about what you are asking, but this top post

[SAtalk] My posting

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
Ok I looked back and I have to agree it is hard to understand what is going on when doing the top posting thing. So for that I appologize. But when someone is learning and trying to understand new things please don't be so rude when you respond to them you are more than likely to get a rude respon

RE: [SAtalk] Running Spam Assassin

2003-01-12 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
I have it working, it had to do with the filters/.tab file Now, How do you configure the options? Say I want to lower the rating required (I just reciveed a porno spam with a rating of 4.9!) -Mensaje original- De: Nick Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: Sunday, January 12, 2003

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassasin corupting email. This is directed totony@svanstrom.com

2003-01-12 Thread Bob Apthorpe
Hi, Everyone take a deep breath... On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:41:01 -0600 "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No it is not doing and decoding to the mail, no there is not anything before > SA doing its job with the mail, and where was I complaining ? You should probably split that sentence i

Re: [SAtalk] Running Spam Assassin

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
I am using the same thing here works fine did you use the included perl script that came in the archice to proccess the incoming mail? > I am using XMail server (www.xmailserver.com) but cant seem to get > this working. I am using the Spam Assassin script on that same page, > it seems to be doing

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassasin corupting email. This is directed to tony@svanstrom.com

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
Well thanks that looks like a handy utility I will install it now. > http://jump.to/oe-quotefix > --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com

[SAtalk] Running Spam Assassin

2003-01-12 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
I am using XMail server (www.xmailserver.com) but cant seem to get this working. I am using the Spam Assassin script on that same page, it seems to be doing something like spamc < mailfile by a PERL script which does not in any way alter the email. If I SSH in and tell it spamc -c < file it will g

[SAtalk] Get SA to check forwarding emails

2003-01-12 Thread Assassin
I have: RedHat 8.0 SquirrelMail 1.2.7 SpamAssassin 2.31 Sendmail 8.12.5-7 SA is working correctly. But I have a lot of domains that I forward onto a remote email address. In /etc/mail/virtusertable I have a lot of "catch-all" email accounts that forward onto for instance a yahoo or msn account. S

Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and spamc/spamd milter problem

2003-01-12 Thread James Long
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:21:09PM -0800, James Long wrote: > > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin', `S=3Dlocal:/var/run/spamass-milter.= > sock, F=3D, T=3DC:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m') > > spamassassin and spamc aren't milters, so you're not going to get very > far. Go look at mimedefang, or another m

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassasin corupting email. This is directed totony@svanstrom.com

2003-01-12 Thread Tony L. Svanstrom
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 the voices made Nick Marino write: NM> I asked for help not your opinion on my posting methods. http://jump.to/oe-quotefix > # Description # # OE-QuoteFix will extend the functionality of MS Outlook Express in numerous # ways! Its main purpose is to modify message compositio

Re: [SAtalk] New SA Install

2003-01-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:31:39PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > I haven't seen SA 2.43 output any "run_rbl_eval_test" lines with the > -D switch although it was surely doing rbl-tests (given the delay and > the fact that it was running with default settings, oh, and the rules > it scored, of cou

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassasin corupting email. This is directed to tony@svanstrom.com

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
No it is not doing and decoding to the mail, no there is not anything before SA doing its job with the mail, and where was I complaining ? And I know for a fact SA is doing it to the mail as it was running fine for over a year till I installed SA, and it was working fine after till I turned off de

Re: [SAtalk] New SA Install

2003-01-12 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:02:44 -0500: > > > run_rbl_eval_test > > > > Not in 2.43, correct? > > I'm not sure of your question. My message was about 2.43, so yes? > I haven't seen SA 2.43 output any "run_rbl_eval_test" lines with the -D switch although it was surely doing r

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassasin corupting email.

2003-01-12 Thread Tony L. Svanstrom
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 the voices made Nick Marino write: NM> It is only doing it to some HTML messages other come out fine. and I told you that with this problem with the server that I mentioned it would only do this to _some_ HTML-messages! Some, not all, only some. Did you bother to check if t

Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and spamc/spamd milter problem

2003-01-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:21:09PM -0800, James Long wrote: > dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin', `S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock, F=, >T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m') > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamc', `S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock, F=, >T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m') spamassassin and spamc aren

[SAtalk] Sendmail and spamc/spamd milter problem

2003-01-12 Thread James Long
I am seeking to install spamassassin in milter mode on a FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE system. The goal is for this system to act as a spam-filtering mail server based on MX records. For mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want to have this FreeBSD server functionioning as an MX host for example.com, preferen

[SAtalk] spamc -c -> more output?

2003-01-12 Thread Olivier M.
Now with spamc -c, only 2 int are returned. What about returning the whole details, like: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.4 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12,EXCUSE_3,EXCUSE_FUTURE, FROM_AND_TO_SAME_5,HTTP_USERNAME_USED, INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSUR

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
ok maybe I explained it wrong I meant the output that it puts to the screen when it executes. - Original Message - From: "Martin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 1:26 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New Ques

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Martin Radford
At Sun Jan 12 18:52:57 2003, Nick Marino wrote: > > one last question about that. > > Since this is going to be running from a sh script would't the output of > unix2dos have to be redirected to null? Of course not. The output of unix2dos is the same as the input, but with LF converted to CRLF.

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
one last question about that. Since this is going to be running from a sh script would't the output of unix2dos have to be redirected to null? - Original Message - From: "Martin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Martin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
thank you very much for the info. - Original Message - From: "Martin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Martin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:47 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Martin Radford
At Sun Jan 12 18:34:08 2003, Nick Marino wrote: > > ok then what about this. "unix2dos < $1 > tempfile" > mv tempfile $1 That would do it. > does the commands in a script wait till the previous one completes execution > before the next line executes? Yes, unless you use the "command &" syntax t

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Martin Radford
At Sun Jan 12 18:31:38 2003, Nick Marino wrote: > > could you expand on the temporary file idea? > > the file names are in this format: 1019045252465.477211.IFIX1 > > I am imagining the numbers are a time stamp. This is the format used by > xmail when creating the messages in the directories of

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
could you expand on the temporary file idea? the file names are in this format: 1019045252465.477211.IFIX1 I am imagining the numbers are a time stamp. This is the format used by xmail when creating the messages in the directories of the users. - Original Message - From: "Martin Radford

Re: [SAtalk] ok_locales xx

2003-01-12 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Michael Moncur wrote on Sat, 11 Jan 2003 10:09:52 -0700: > I believe if you don't set ok_locales, it defaults to 'all', so no score is > added. > This is not how the man page reads. > If you set it to something (i.e. 'en') then the five non-English > locales mentioned I think you simply can't s

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
ok then what about this. "unix2dos < $1 > tempfile" mv tempfile $1 does the commands in a script wait till the previous one completes execution before the next line executes? - Original Message - From: "Martin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Theo

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Martin Radford
At Sun Jan 12 17:49:59 2003, Nick Marino wrote: > > true but the reason I am having to run this on my incoming mail is because > SA is corrupting some emails by stripping CR from them. Only some of the > html messages not all. > > So anyway.. this "unix2dos < $1 > file" > would have to be this: "

Re: [SAtalk] New SA Install

2003-01-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 05:31:38PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > run_rbl_eval_test > > Not in 2.43, correct? I'm not sure of your question. My message was about 2.43, so yes? -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "One of my youngest employees once said `How does it feel managing someone young enoug

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
true but the reason I am having to run this on my incoming mail is because SA is corrupting some emails by stripping CR from them. Only some of the html messages not all. So anyway.. this "unix2dos < $1 > file" would have to be this: "unix2dos < $1 > $1" In order for it to write back to the same

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:23:56AM -0600, Nick Marino wrote: > Can anyone tell me how to run unix2dos from a shell I would image all output > should be redirected to null as when I run it like unix2dos $1 from my > script it never ends. It just keeps hanging and proccessing never ends. This has ab

RE: [SAtalk] Turn off SA in user_prefs?

2003-01-12 Thread Steve Thomas
They could set required_hits to 1000 or something - that wouldn't disable it completely, but it'd keep messages from being flagged. | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On | Behalf Of Victor Brilon | Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 10:32 PM | To: s

RE: [SAtalk] Question

2003-01-12 Thread Steve Thomas
report_header use_terse_report | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On | Behalf Of Nick Marino | Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 1:27 AM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: [SAtalk] Question | | | Where do you configure SA to tell it to put the spa

[SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
Can anyone tell me how to run unix2dos from a shell I would image all output should be redirected to null as when I run it like unix2dos $1 from my script it never ends. It just keeps hanging and proccessing never ends. --- This SF.NET email

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassasin corupting email.

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
Guess you didnt read the thread. It is only doing it to some HTML messages other come out fine. They all have html coding with images and things like that. They are spam of course but none the less still on some emails are effected. - Original Message - From: "Tony L. Svanstrom" <[EMAIL

Re: [SAtalk] Razor2 Problems

2003-01-12 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 11:49 AM 1.12.2003 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 10:09:21AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: >> Jan 12 10:01:21 sage-american spamd[91734]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file >> descriptor IO::Socket::INET: Interrupted system call ...propagated at >> /usr/local/lib/perl5/s

Re: [SAtalk] Razor2 Problems

2003-01-12 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 11:49 AM 1.12.2003 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 10:09:21AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: >> Jan 12 10:01:21 sage-american spamd[91734]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file >> descriptor IO::Socket::INET: Interrupted system call ...propagated at >> /usr/local/lib/perl5/s

Re: [SAtalk] Razor2 Problems

2003-01-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:07:01AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply. I have been checking the razor dns frequently. > It still "discovers" the IP of 216.52.13.90 Well, that IP is the discovery server. It's the data that gets retrieved which is important. I noticed I was h

Re: [SAtalk] Razor2 Problems

2003-01-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 10:09:21AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: > Jan 12 10:01:21 sage-american spamd[91734]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file > descriptor IO::Socket::INET: Interrupted system call ...propagated at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 391. The p

[SAtalk] Razor2 Problems

2003-01-12 Thread Jack L. Stone
I am running SA-2.43 on UNIX. All of a sudden, I'm getting 20+ second delays because of the following problem with razor2 as shown in the mail log: Jan 12 10:01:21 sage-american spamd[91734]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor IO::Socket::INET: Interrupted system call ...propagated a

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassasin corupting email.

2003-01-12 Thread Tony L. Svanstrom
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 the voices made Nick Marino write: NM> From: "Tony L. Svanstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NM> > It could be the server... I've had some problem with servers doing NM> > base64-decoding, problems which could maybe result in problems like yours. NM> I dont think so as its only doin

[SAtalk] spamassassin + vmailmgr (serverwide) ?

2003-01-12 Thread Olivier M.
Good morning, I see there is good vpopmail support in spamassassin, and would need something similar for vmailmgr (qmail addon like vpopmail): is there already somebody working on this "case", or some code available ? Found nothing searching with google, but maybe there is devel in progress somew

[SAtalk] Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
Where do you configure SA to tell it to put the spam message in the body instead of the header and vise versa? --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.co

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassasin corupting email.

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
I dont think so as its only doing it to some email messages. Which in turn when using outlook express makes the mail retrievel hang and time out. If I go in and run unix2dos on teh files sitting in the users folder then the emails are fine then and can be download. - Original Message - Fr