Let me revive an old theme:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:03:31AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 05:29:46PM +0400, Andrew A. Vasilyev wrote:
> > I get your point of view, but why didn't you put
> > the rule name at the end of former line in pa
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:55:48PM +0100, Sean Cardus wrote:
> I've done just that... In PerMsgStatus.pm I've changed lines 2214-2216
> to:
> $self->{test_logs} .= sprintf ("* % 2.1f -- %s%s [%s]\n%s",
> $score, $area, $desc,
> $r
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 09:21:21AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> I've always considered the "no rule names report format" a "duh" feature of
> SA, so I for one am glad for the change.
I get your point of view, but why didn't you put
the rule name at the end of former line in parenthesis.
An
Hi!
Could the developers be so kind to explain the reason for
changing the _REPORT_ template output format?
Old:
X-Spam-Report: -17.3 points, 5.0 required;
* 1.0 -- From: does not include a real name
* 0.4 -- BODY: HTML is missing "table" close tags
* 0.3 -- BO
Hi!
Is there any CVS mirror for SA project? Probably the
cvs.sourceforge.net is overloaded, too often aborting the connections.
ANDY
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Bec
> HS> are way too high - a lot of legitimate email gets flagged. I have
> HS> adjusted them for my system, but it might be nice to make spamassassin
> HS> less English centric out of the box.
>
> It is not English-centric. It is an RFC violation to have 8-bit
> characters there. Flagging RFC vio
