I am getting a lot of BigEvilList_72 (http://www.exclaimer.co.uk) FP as one
of my group clients get mail from lawyer that uses this product. Can someone
provide some feed back on why this is a rule so insted of just deleting it i
know have an educated answer to my client
Thank
Paul
No Bayes db yet, but I would think the one rule would score it a 5
Paul
Covington, Chris wrote:
Your Bayes must be hosed if what you think is spam gets BAYES_00.
Chris
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Diaguila
Sent
There is something wrong.. My posts have been bouncing back to me with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delay reason: SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data:
host sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net [10.3.1.7]:
421 Unexpected failure, please try later
> -Original Message-
> From: Gar
Spam-Score: 3.422
BAYES_00,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,HTML_50_60,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,RM_rb_ANCHOR,RM_rb_BODY,RM_rb_HTML,SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.30 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
???
thank
I am getting a lot of BigEvilList_72 (http://www.exclaimer.co.uk) FP as one
of my group clients get mail from lawyer that uses this product. Can someone
provide some feed back on why this is a rule so insted of just deleting it i
know have an educated answer to my client
Thank
Paul
FP.
Thank
Paul
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
e a little digging and I think i need perl-PDL which I'm now
downloading using Yast.. wondered if anyone's come across this problem
before.. tempted just to use CPAN :-)
rgds,
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hutchings
> Sent: 21 January 2004 15:06
> To: '
ough.
X-Spam-Score: 1.8
BAYES_30,HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE,OACYS_CONS_6,RM_rb_ANCHOR,RM_rb_BODY,RM_rb_HTML,RM_sl_Parens,SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST
What am I missing?
Thanks...
Paul
---
The
http://postfix.cnc.bc.ca/twiki/bin/view/Main/SpamAssassinTaggingOnly is what
I use with Postfix to do pretty much the same thing. Very simple and it
works.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
knowing
what to look for..
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference
I as well have gotten alot and want to set it to 0 and exlude it from bayes.
So just to confirm i enter the below in my local.cf file. Non have made it
thought because of things like big evil however might as well make it 0 till
they work out how to stop it.
thanks
score HABEAS-SWE 0
bayes_igno
e spamtrap user, and also are getting updated
again when other users process spam.
I shall make a recommendation to the author of that documentation (which
otherwise is very fine documentation) for an update to his site
Thanks again for the help...
regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
later, it
still says 30 in the next entry in the log.
The logs do indeed indicate that it's using the correct database. I would have
assumed that regardless as to whether or not it's using the database during the
learn process, it would need to add the information about the spam that
spams via regular rules then it will start
actually using the bayes database and allow me to teach it?
Thanks muchly for the help...
regards,
Paul
Quoting Bryan Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Paul Fielding wrote:
> >
> > I recently set up a shared database w
dated, usually within the last 5 or 10
minutes (it's a low volume server), but it doesn't change immediately when I
process mail through the spamtrap or hamtrap.
Should it be? I'm only concerned that they're not actually doing anything...
, I could have done it in a single line, but I decided to be neat and tidy
about it :)
Anyways, that fixed the problem and now all is running well. Thanks again!
regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Deugau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Fielding&quo
24696]: connection from
localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 38227Jan 14 02:39:38 hildegard spamd[24721]:
info: setuid to paul succeededJan 14 02:39:38 hildegard spamd[24721]:
processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]ilda>
for paul:1000.Jan 14 02:39:42 hildegard spamd[24721]: identified spam
(55.9/5
Has anyone create a button (or some other way) that i can install on a
client outlook that will submit the email to the my bayes learning account?
The current process to "resend the message" is above most of my users and
button would be much easier.
Thanks for any
quot; user
lol. (send off a dialup account to a server on another isp a blank message
from outlook using a template (gif in background) and a subject only). I
use bigeveil and jen's suff
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Chipman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Januar
Thinking more about blocking it at the MTA. As the SA/Amavis box is not the
Main server and there might be times that the SA box will not know all the
valid users is it possible to create a list of account that i want SA/Amavis
to check and all other go through uncheck?
Paul
PS sorry about the
dmail because I've never used it but as a newbie I found the
above fairly simple to follow.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Maher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I get a large number of email send to the server for users that have not
worked here (more then a year) or do not exist so i created a rule to filter
them out. This rules works great however i have notice a problem. I get
email addressed to "beau" this is the last 4 letter of my name. What i hav
I know you can do this with postfix, i wouldn't do it for all domains as it
would cause way too many problems IMHO, but it may be worth testing on
frequently forged domains like aol, yahoo, msn etc..
regards,
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd
/usr/libdata/perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd /usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl
/usr/libdata/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl) at (eval 105)
line 3."
Dec 31 05:28:10 hy-sm-01.hypernet.ca amavisd[30483]: (30483-08) timer
stopped after DA
MZ to handle all mail in and out from our Exchange system.. works a charm.
regards,
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkins, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 December 2003 15:08
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [SAtalk] Postfix and Spamassasin
>
did not want to
have his mail filtered at the server level was getting learned as good mail
and basically rendering the solution ineffective for most other people in
the organization.
Paul Hirschorn
BraveLine Technology
136 W21 Street 8th Floor
New York, NY 10003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web
ave a little time it's easy enough (IMHO) to stick a postfix box in
front of your mail server and run SA on that, it's what I did and so far
i've not looked back.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mai
Do you want to use it with an email client, or with an email server?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Tong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
ble to RBL blocking for selected addresses..
it's great!
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Marvin Raab [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 November 2003 17:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamassassin and Exchange 2000
>
>
> Same with me at
I do
just that (with Exchange 5.5) and it works great.
I went
with Redhat 9, Postfix and Spamassassin, mostly as per this little guide - http://postfix.cnc.bc.ca/twiki/bin/view/Main/SpamAssassinTaggingOnly
regards,Paul--Paul HutchingsNetwork
Administrator, MIRA Ltd.Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378
Hi all,
I had a fully functioning system running SpamAssassin(daemon) 2.55 Antivir
2.66 Exim 4.12 all on top of SuSE 8.2.
Having many ppieces on SpamAssassin I picked up on the fact that it was good
advice to upgrade and keep apace of the progress being made.
So I dutifu
ssassin with that option
especially with mysql user prefs and the way they work currently. Just my
personal opinion.
Paul Hirschorn
BraveLine Technology
136 W21 Street 8th Floor
New York, NY 10003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:www.braveline.com
voice:
It's hard to quantify as we didn't have a great deal get through with 2.5x,
but I would have to say that in the short (6 months or so) that I've been
using SA, 2.60 is the best version so far.. still staggered that it's all
free!
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Adm
I had a successful configuration running Exim 4.12 SpamAssassin 2.55 Antivir
6,22 all on SuSE 8.2.
After reading the SpamAssassin website, where the suggestion was
to keep pace
with current releases, so I done the
'Installing or Upgrading SpamAssassin
/view/Main/SpamAssassinAndPostFix there is
a simple script that will hook it into spamassassin.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Robban [mailto:[EMAI
just the obious answer, if someone who has a legitimate account there tries
to send you email it will get flagged as spam..
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter P. Benac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 November 2003 18:17
> To: 'SpamAssassin'
> Subject: [SAtalk] A black listing question
Seems well regarded.
I'm currently logging any hits to see if it's worth adding to my per user
DNSBLs that I use to reject mail to the people who get the most spam.
The ones at http://abuse.easynet.nl are also well worth a look.
regards,
Paul
> -Original Message-
> Fr
nctionality of spamassassin? This may be more of a development question
if so.
Paul Hirschorn
BraveLine Technology
136 W21 Street 8th Floor
New York, NY 10003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:www.braveline.com
voice: 212.376.4000 x311
fax:
P.S. I did a manual entry of a spam message to razor and it works fine.
razor-check -d < test.email Connects returns valid results.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul
Hirschorn
Sent: 07 November 2003 16:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 392.
Any idea how to fix this? Razor2 and Razor2 sdk are both installed.
Paul Hirschorn
BraveLine Technology
136 W21 Street 8th Floor
New York, NY 10003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:www.braveline.com
voice: 212
We have spam
assassin running, some users didnt get spam before hand and I wanted to know if
there is a ignore_usr option to completely ignore specified email addresses?
Thanks
of a halfway house but it's better than nothing.
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 November 2003 18:08
> To: Paul Hutchings
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] OT: examples of "email blocked due to spam,
> contact us here&qu
us fill in this form and we might whitelist you".
Guess i'd like to see what sort of wording people are using - since these
people might be customers some sugar-coating would be nice!
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)2
solution they would personally be more happy with?
Paul Hirschorn
BraveLine Technology
136 W21 Street 8th Floor
New York, NY 10003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:www.braveline.com
voice: 212.376.4000 x311
fax:212.843.3204
---
This SF.net
message, maybe just even append a custom first line to the
message. Thank you for your helpo
Paul Hirschorn
BraveLine Technology
136 W21 Street 8th Floor
New York, NY 10003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:www.braveline.com
voice: 212.376.4000 x311
fax:
Take a look at
http://postfix.cnc.bc.ca/twiki/bin/view/Main/SpamAssassinTaggingOnly
I'm using it here with spamd/spamc and it works a charm - I'm assuming you
already have postfix setup as an inbound relay?
regards,
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Angel Gabrie
filter and pass all inbound mail to an internal
Exchange 5.5 box and also to deliver outbound mail unfiltered.
You could take a look at
http://postfix.cnc.bc.ca/twiki/bin/view/Main/SpamAssassinTaggingOnly for a
real quick way to bolt on spamassassin once you have postfix up and running.
he options, to me "--remove-addr-from-whitelist" means I'm not whitelisted,
not that I am, IYSWIM?
Thanks for the reply and the advice!
regards,
Paul
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you li
telist" and it is reducing the
scores, but the GTUBE test has such a high score that the adjustment doesn't
seem to be enough!
I hope that makes sense, TIA for any advice!
regards,
Paul
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The S
Oh no. I didn't mean to mail the entire list. Got to remember to change that To: line.
Huge mistake. (I acutally went queue fishing after sending and thought I stopped it
it.)
OH well!
By switching our customers who want ham only to X.400, we will eliminate spam. (OK...
Just joking.)
Actuall
You should call me. I'm starting a company that will eliminate spam for good. Not just
filter it. Filtration won't scale. We'll be eliminating spam for good.
CP
--
Chris Paul
Rex Consulting - Messaging and Security Solutions - www.rexconsulting.net
+1 831.338.7712
Key fingerpr
Simplest thing I've found is to have users move the entire item to a Public
Folder, you can then use something like mozilla/netscape to get the folder
in mbox format which can be learned quite easily.
regards,
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Kohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
tr -d '\r' evilrules.cf.new
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Merchberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 2:30 PM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Evil rules HUGE update!
>
> At 15:39 10/14/2003 -0500, Stewart, John wrote:
>
> >Ok
gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
> See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
> Click here: ht
I think that's more of an MTA function than spamassassin - AIUI spamassassin
won't delete/reject mail by itself.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Fr
I played with the howto on openandhome, it seems really simple to get
spamassassin up and running on windows, the problem seems to be finding a
Windows MTA that can take an email, pipe it out then re-inject it and deal
with it.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel
I wouldn't mind a copy if possible. FWIW I use Outlook/Exchange at work, I
get my users to drag spam into a public folder (so the headers go as well)
then synchronise with Netscape/Mozilla mail as it produces an mbox file
which sa-learn can handle.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Ne
to join in!
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMA
t some spammish mails
blocked, but users in all_spam_to should never get mail blocked.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
--
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
570-628-5303
www.f-tech.net
I had the same problem on my Redhat box and needed to install the db4-devel
rpms to be able to install the db_file CPAN module.
regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 20
depends on the RBL I guess, there might be an argument for doing that with
something like spews, or cc specific ones as they probably don't change that
much hour to hour, but with something like spamcop you'd have no chance as
it changes all the time.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchin
's prefs
to call up, and therefore the @GLOBAL settings are used.
Since I am using a single uid/gid to deliver mail to all users I cannot use
dir ownership (or can I?) Can I rip it out of the message somehow?
Any fellow qmail users up against this??
--
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
570
stuff
started happening.
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Gregoire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Copies of outgoing emails
master.cf
Description: Binary data
bayes
files - it looks like it's not changed since the upgrade.
Any pointers on how to test this out and check it is working properly (mail
is still getting scored and tagged).
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8
TED]>;
Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:49:20 -0700 (PDT)Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>From:
"Paul Gregoire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject:
Re: Spamassassin-talk -- confirmation of subscription -- request 562054Date:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:32:04 -0700
Chris Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just upgraded from rc5 and did something wrong.
>
> It appears that the BAYES database is not being consulted by
> SpamAssassin.
>
> Some mail is not getting scored at all. Other mail gets a h
I just upgraded from rc5 and did something wrong.
It appears that the BAYES database is not being consulted by
SpamAssassin.
Some mail is not getting scored at all. Other mail gets a higher than
normal score due to not getting BAYES scored. I see no BAYES tags in the
headers at all.
I can read t
The spamassassin mentions several times about a user-prefs script using mysql
as a backend.. but the link to the spamassassin site does not list the file.
is it gone?
Can I get a copy?
Thanks
--
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
570-628-5303
www.f-tech.net
anything that goes out from a box of mine.
regards,
Paul
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
nesday 10 September 2003 19:46, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 06:21 PM 9/10/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
> >Whats causing the 3X difference in msg scanning?
>
> Are you using _ANY_ network checks? DNS blacklists, razor2, dcc, pyzor, etc
> all have wildly varying times because they are
3
1.6 2953
0.5 1686
0.6 8309
0.5 2293
0.5 3100
0.6 1493
1.5 3801
These number do not match peak load numbers. I was in the 10-20second per msg
range between 6-9pm EST.
On Thursday 11 September 2003 22:17, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 09:42 PM 9/11/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
> >New m
1342
8.4 1421
7.6 1456
11.3 1424
2.0 2099
2.2 4799
9.1 4901
2.4 1414
2.5 1414
3.6 1340
better... but still not getting the < 1 second per message.
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 19:46, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 06:21 PM 9/10/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
> >Whats causing the
5155
17.6 27873
5.9 5134
3.9 4048
6.9 9856
4.4 3976
4.3 7112
11.1 21048
4.9 9847
4.2 2780
its looking like a second per kb... but there are 12second 3K scans, and 4
second 4K scans.
Whats causing the 3X difference in msg scanning?
Thanks
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
570-628-5303
www.f
t made learning about Postfix a lot easier
simply because it splits all the options into the relevent areas. Whilst I
never tried Sendmail it does have a Sendmail module.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "John B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
iated.
Paul
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here
Gotcha - thanks for the clarification.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Hutchings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 4:02 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 r
Excellent! Any idea roughly how long until it's on CPAN?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
Thanks - I'm about to head off for the day, but I shall take a look on your
emporium and see what I can do!
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
>
Any ideas?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerc
slip through?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Radford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 August 2003 15:04
> To: Paul Hutchings
>
ng the right lines or not?
If it all goes well I may just stick a spare drive in the Dell and stick
Debian on that, but if it all goes too well and I end up with a working
Compaq box I'm wondering if it will be up to the job - I'm mostly a
Microsof
doing something dumb and training it that my own
mail server sends spam etc..
I did ask this several months back but didn't manage to find much info, so
any advice would be gratefully received.
regards,
Paul
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by
I'm not familiar with iPlanet, but we use a linux/postfix relay in front of
our exchange boxes. I set mine up as per
http://www.advosys.ca/papers/printable/postfix-filtering.html and it works
like a charm.
regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Fraley" <[EM
are 433 celerons w 128 ram good enough,
we have a few of them left, One already has IPCOP, so I thought one for SA
then the last one for SQUID ?
- Original Message -
From:
Russ
To: Chris Santerre ; 'Jean-Paul Natola' ; Ben Story ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
Now that i have this info, is there any kind
of Content filter that is linux based, if so ,
can it run on the same box as SA?
- Original Message -
From:
Ben Story
To: 'Jean-Paul Natola' ; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Thursday, August
Chris Santerre ; 'Jean-Paul Natola' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:53
PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie
I used to use an old 486 with 40 meg of ram
running RH 7.3 as a firewall with iptables.
Worked great 'til the scsi's diedjust reti
I have other options?
- Original Message -
From:
Ben Story
To: 'Jean-Paul Natola' ; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:03
PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Newbie
Jean-Paul,
It really depends on
your environment. I
Hi all
I'm new to this, so bear with me,
what kind of box do I need to load spamassasin
on, and where can I get it.
Note: I already downloaded the program spamassasin,
just need to know where to get the OS to utilize
tia
Jean-Paul Natola Systems
Administ
well I'm to Linux, but I have alot of
experience in UNIX HP-UX 10.2 just that its been a while, but
we are non-profit , and all these firewalls and spam apps are very
expensive. we are a small 40 user org
- Original Message -
From:
Angel Gabriel
To: Jean
A settings from within Webmail.
http://www.horde.org/
Paul
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XB
current versions of SA or
whether something like this is planned for future releases? Otherwise, does anyone
have any suggestions, patches or comments?
Many thanks,
Paul Gamble
M-Web: S.A.'s most trusted and reliable Internet Service Provider. Just Like That.
To join, go to: http://join.mweb.
e use postfix just to tag spam.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Litwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 July 2003 14:46
> To:
Not a problem, we have a nuclear power station on-site...
From: Kristian Koehntopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Paul Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Sun Enterprise 1, spamd relay
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2
Hello All,
Quite soon, I could possibly be inheriting a spare Enterprise 1
(possibly fully loaded, i.e. 64processors etc...), for use with
spamassassin.
I am looking for a highly documented and maintained procedure for
implementing spamassassin with Solaris 8/9, which relays (no mailboxes
test it for the "X-Spam-Flag: YES" presence.
See you later in Netland,
Paul-Henri
--
... ooo OOO Black holes are where God divided by zero. OOO ooo ...
---<<< Minas Ithil, Tower of the Moon, Role-Playing Library >>>---
[
exist. Thanks for your help :-)
See you later in Netland,
Paul-Henri
--
... ooo OOO Black holes are where God divided by zero. OOO ooo ...
---<<< Minas Ithil, Tower of the Moon, Role-Playing Library >>>---
---
Th
stfix aliases
maps these to username@, it appears the filter still tries to lookup
prefs for firstname.lastname in the SQL database.. which of course,
fails.
Has anyone got this setup working?
Paul
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Did you work those out yourself, or using some third party util - if so,
might I enquire what?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bayes range Total score
>
> 1-10%3.7 (Just a few
) RBL: DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Open Relay
The user is using Outlook 2K to compose the message. I know I have
configured my mail server to not allow open relay, so could someone please
explain what SA is telling me here.
Thank you in advance.
Paul Lee
Network Administrator
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo