Re: [SAtalk] [RD] this is the spam I'm fighting, and why rules don't hit.

L PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:37 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [RD] this is the spam I'm fighting, and why rules don't hit. > > Chris Santerre writes: > > I finally got one of these boogers above a 7 so I had the raw in my trap. > > Take a look at this

RE: [SAtalk] [RD] this is the spam I'm fighting, and why rules don't hit.

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:37 PM > To: Chris Santerre > Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [RD] this is the spam I'm fighting, and > why rules > don'

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] this is the spam I'm fighting, and why rules don't hit.

Chris Santerre writes: > I finally got one of these boogers above a 7 so I had the raw in my trap. > Take a look at this raw mbox email and why SA rules don't hit. The MUA > decodes the email and shows the spam when read. After the * is > what the decoded base64 looks like. Headers don

[SAtalk] [RD] this is the spam I'm fighting, and why rules don't hit.

I finally got one of these boogers above a 7 so I had the raw in my trap. Take a look at this raw mbox email and why SA rules don't hit. The MUA decodes the email and shows the spam when read. After the * is what the decoded base64 looks like. Headers don't matter. I've looked at them a