-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:59 PM
To: Mark; Lukreme; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)
At 01:19 AM 11/21/03 +, Mark wrote:
I dunno; why is everyone so
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 7:46 AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:59 PM
To: Mark; Lukreme; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
- Original Message -
From: Lukreme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 7:17 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)
On 11 Nov 2003, at 10:09, Robert James Kaes wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any comments on the quality
At 01:19 AM 11/21/03 +, Mark wrote:
I dunno; why is everyone so enthusiastic about cbl.abuseat.org? I added it
today, in my Milter, right after bl.spamcop.net and dynablock.easynet.nl.
But, so far, I only got 1 (!) hit on it. Seems a bit lame. Unless the former
two cover pretty much everything
On 11 Nov 2003, at 10:09, Robert James Kaes wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any comments on the quality of the cbl.abuseat.org
DNSBL? I noticed that it isn't used in SpamAssassin, but it is one of
the black lists checked by spamcop. Is anyone else using this list?
I use it a the postfix level to
