On 12 Nov 2003, at 10:09, Covington, Chris wrote:
And it doesn't help that Razor, DCC and Pyzor have a lot of users that
report legitimate solicited commercial email as spam (the people that
forget to uncheck send me great offers when they order a product from
a vendor, and then report those
Lukreme wrote:
On 10 Nov 2003, at 07:33, Terry Milnes wrote:
The typical user is capable of making toast in his electric toaster,
but when it comes to the overwhelming complexities involved in
operating a computer he is totally lost. He will become extremely
agitated when he looses the *REALLY
On 11 Nov 2003, at 12:17, Larry Gilson wrote:
I don't know if this really fits in this subject or not. However, I
keep
thinking while reading this thread if anyone considers real opt-in
advertisements/messages that get tagged by SA (like from OshKosh,
Travelocity, Lands' End, etc.) to be a FP or
Lukreme wrote:
On 08 Nov 2003, at 06:46, Terry Milnes wrote:
Some of us though are system administrators and need a solution to
offer to the end users. The typical end user wants to open their
email and see no spam, period.
Since the definition of spam varies from person to person that is
On 10 Nov 2003, at 07:33, Terry Milnes wrote:
The typical user is capable of making toast in his electric toaster,
but when it comes to the overwhelming complexities involved in
operating a computer he is totally lost. He will become extremely
agitated when he looses the *REALLY IMPORTANT*
On 07 Nov 2003, at 08:29, Maarten J H van den Berg wrote:
Just being curious at how this system came about...
As I understand it by feeding millions of spam and ham messages to the
filters and seeing what sticks.
Now, for your purposes, subjects with [word blacklisted by stupid list
server]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lukreme writes:
Now, for your purposes, subjects with [word blacklisted by stupid list
server] might be exclusively spam. They might not be exclusively spam
for others. That's why you can override any score in your own cf file.
If you want to
On 08 Nov 2003, at 22:34, Dan Kohn wrote:
I recommend allowing
mistake-based training of the small number of false negatives (I use
procmail for this as described at
http://www.dankohn.com/archives/000323.htm).
that link does not load.
--
Athene we all have our moments when we lose it
Slyspy the
On 08 Nov 2003, at 06:46, Terry Milnes wrote:
Some of us though are system administrators and need a solution to
offer to the end users. The typical end user wants to open their
email and see no spam, period.
Since the definition of spam varies from person to person that is
simply not possible
PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Re: scoring system and values...
On 08 Nov 2003, at 22:34, Dan Kohn wrote:
I recommend allowing
mistake-based training of the small number of false negatives (I use
procmail for this as described at
http://www.dankohn.com/archives/000323.htm).
that link does
10 matches
Mail list logo
