At 23:38 8/07/03 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 01:16 PM 7/9/03 +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> hi to all,
>
> I'm still having an unresolve problem with my Email server having
> spamassassin. My server load increases when it scans less than a hundred
> of
> emails in transit. I'm running spamassas
At 12:51 PM 7/9/03 +0800, Michael P. Carel wrote:
thanks for the reply. What I also observed was, when a user used to send an
email using pine mailer, which has a group addressbook,
and used to send email to all that goup(which has a large list of email
addresses) by including it all to CC: the se
> Questions:
> you stated the load went up after "only 100 messages".. 100 messages in
> what timeframe? 1 hour? 1 second?
>
> Suggestions:
>
> 1) really whatever is calling spamc should be using some kind of mechanism
> to limit the number of spamc's it calls. If xamime is calling out 20
> spamc's
At 01:16 PM 7/9/03 +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> hi to all,
>
> I'm still having an unresolve problem with my Email server having
> spamassassin. My server load increases when it scans less than a hundred
> of
> emails in transit. I'm running spamassassin daemon.
>
> Any idea why? Please help us
> > hi to all,
> >
> > I'm still having an unresolve problem with my Email server having
> > spamassassin. My server load increases when it scans less than a hundred
> > of
> > emails in transit. I'm running spamassassin daemon.
> >
> > Any idea why? Please help us.
>
> Well naturally SpamAssassi
> hi to all,
>
> I'm still having an unresolve problem with my Email server having
> spamassassin. My server load increases when it scans less than a hundred
> of
> emails in transit. I'm running spamassassin daemon.
>
> Any idea why? Please help us.
Well naturally SpamAssassin is going to increa
hi to all,
I'm still having an unresolve problem with my Email server having
spamassassin. My server load increases when it scans less than a hundred of
emails in transit. I'm running spamassassin daemon.
Any idea why? Please help us.
regards,
Mikecarel
> > I've installed spamassassin 2.54 in redhat 7.3 with a machine specs
> > of Intel PII 350MHz 128MB, there are times that my server loads
> > abnormally increases when spamassassin daemon scanning emails. I used
> > to restart the daemon process and the server load back to normal
> > again.
>
>
> hi to all,
>
> I've installed spamassassin 2.54 in redhat 7.3 with a machine specs of
> Intel
> PII 350MHz 128MB, there are trimes that my server loads abnormally
> increases
> when
.you try to post a message to the spamassassin list ? ;-)
Try leaving 'vmstat 5' running in a window and see
* Michael P. Carel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've installed spamassassin 2.54 in redhat 7.3 with a machine specs
> of Intel PII 350MHz 128MB, there are times that my server loads
> abnormally increases when spamassassin daemon scanning emails. I used
> to restart the daemon process and the server lo
hi to all,
I've installed spamassassin 2.54 in redhat 7.3 with a machine specs of
Intel
PII 350MHz 128MB, there are times that my server loads abnormally increases
when spamassassin daemon scanning emails. I used to restart the daemon
process and the server load back to normal again.
Any idea
hi to all,
I've installed spamassassin 2.54 in redhat 7.3 with a machine specs of Intel
PII 350MHz 128MB, there are trimes that my server loads abnormally increases
when
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & C
> I think you're going to run into problems. I would suggest you think
> about adding three more of those boxes, maybe more.
As a reference, 4 880s with 2 CPUs and 4GB of RAM are currently handling
~ 2.2 million messages a day (in conjunction with MIMEDefang) without
breaking in to a serious swe
Yeah testing will be done pretty heavily before put into production. Also
this product might not work under our load. That is where the testing
comes in. I was courious to see what type of load I could expect, it does
not look good from what I am hearing. I am still in the planning stage of
thi
Keith Olmstead said the following on 19/11/02 16:11:
Hello,
A quick question. After doing some reading, I noticed alot ppl have SA
running on Intel boxes. Is anyone running SA on Solaris boxes? Will be
processing about 600k emails/day on one mail server and was wondering how
it would fair. It
Keith Olmstead wrote:
Hello,
A quick question. After doing some reading, I noticed alot ppl have SA
running on Intel boxes. Is anyone running SA on Solaris boxes? Will be
processing about 600k emails/day on one mail server and was wondering how
it would fair. It is a Sun V880 with dual 700 sp
Hello,
A quick question. After doing some reading, I noticed alot ppl have SA
running on Intel boxes. Is anyone running SA on Solaris boxes? Will be
processing about 600k emails/day on one mail server and was wondering how
it would fair. It is a Sun V880 with dual 700 sparc cpu and 4 gig of ra
17 matches
Mail list logo
