File a bugzilla ticket on it, and attach the patch, then assign the
ticket to me.
C
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 10:12, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jim Holmes wrote:
>
> > --On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Jus
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jim Holmes wrote:
> --On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
> > be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
> > to
--On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
> be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
> to a central address, which, IMHO, is "A Bad Thing" ..
Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
to a central address, which, IMHO, is "A Bad Thing" ...
Has anyone looked at changing:
my $status = $spamtest->check($mail);
if ($status->is_s
