I was thinking today wouldn't it be better to just ignore all the periods,
commas, and what have you in the text? Inside SA we could just drop those
and then search the message from that.
I've had one spammer who just puts a random period in the message and it
doesn't get tagged. Taking
Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bill Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.Spamassassins reads in the message
2. It then stores the original message in two variables
3. In the second variable remove all punctuation, spaces,
special encoded
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 05:25:57 -0500
Colin A. Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
I have a client who can NEVER seem to get spacing down. I don't know
if he can't type well or what but he always misses spaces after
sentences, never uses the right punctuation, etc. Much like this
example
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:52:11 -0500 (EST)
Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
I've had one spammer who just puts a random period in the message and it
doesn't get tagged. Taking out all the periods in the message and it
scored a 10.6 just from the body of the message.
(...)
I've seen things
--On Monday, November 10, 2003 10:52 AM -0500 Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had one spammer who just puts a random period in the message and it
doesn't get tagged. Taking out all the periods in the message and it
scored a 10.6 just from the body of the message.
I think the keyword is
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 12:01, Evan Platt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] t0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe SA needs to run it once through a leet-speek filter? :-)
--
Frank Pineau
Hey, you know those Roman hackers? Man, were they I III III VII!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Message -
From: Evan Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: SpamAssassin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Is punctuation really needed? (fwd)
Plus, there's very few ga---BLAH---ppy p-blah-orn spams making it too.
Spammers are catching on that they can't
Lyle Evans said:
At 10:52 AM 11/10/03, Jason wrote:
...
I was thinking today wouldn't it be better to just ignore all the
periods,
commas, and what have you in the text? Inside SA we could just drop
those
and then search the message from that.
I've had one spammer who just puts a random
Sorry for replying to my own message, but that should have read:
http://sandgnat.com/cmos/cmos.jsp?sourceRules=body+CUM+/\bcum\b/
(http, not https)
Chris Thielen said:
Lyle Evans said:
At 10:52 AM 11/10/03, Jason wrote:
...
I was thinking today wouldn't it be better to just ignore all the
Lyle Evans Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:51 PM
Yes I am being hit hard by he same type of spam.
I too am getting them. My SPAM_SENTENCE rules are catching all of these
messages from this spammer. I was getting FN's from these messages so I
added these rules which catch all of the weird
-Original Message-
From: Bill Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Is punctuation really needed? (fwd)
Simple solution
Not so simple :)
1.Spamassassins reads in the message
2. It then stores
Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bill Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.Spamassassins reads in the message
2. It then stores the original message in two variables
3. In the second variable remove all punctuation, spaces,
special encoded
12 matches
Mail list logo
