Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
ok maybe I explained it wrong I meant the output that it puts to the screen when it executes. - Original Message - From: "Martin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 12,

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Martin Radford
At Sun Jan 12 18:52:57 2003, Nick Marino wrote: > > one last question about that. > > Since this is going to be running from a sh script would't the output of > unix2dos have to be redirected to null? Of course not. The output of unix2dos is the same as the input, but with LF converted to CRLF.

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
c: "Martin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:47 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New Question > At Sun Jan 12 18:34:08 2003, Nick Marino wrote: > > > > ok then what

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
AIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:47 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New Question > At Sun Jan 12 18:34:08 2003, Nick Marino wrote: > > > > ok then what about this. "unix2dos < $1 > tempfile" > > mv tempfile $1 > > That would do it. >

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Martin Radford
At Sun Jan 12 18:34:08 2003, Nick Marino wrote: > > ok then what about this. "unix2dos < $1 > tempfile" > mv tempfile $1 That would do it. > does the commands in a script wait till the previous one completes execution > before the next line executes? Yes, unless you use the "command &" syntax t

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Martin Radford
At Sun Jan 12 18:31:38 2003, Nick Marino wrote: > > could you expand on the temporary file idea? > > the file names are in this format: 1019045252465.477211.IFIX1 > > I am imagining the numbers are a time stamp. This is the format used by > xmail when creating the messages in the directories of

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
artin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:14 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New Question > At Sun Jan 12 17:49:59 2003, Nick Mar

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:14 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New Question > At Sun Jan 12 17:49:59 2003, Nick Marino wrote: > > > > true but the reason I am

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Martin Radford
At Sun Jan 12 17:49:59 2003, Nick Marino wrote: > > true but the reason I am having to run this on my incoming mail is because > SA is corrupting some emails by stripping CR from them. Only some of the > html messages not all. > > So anyway.. this "unix2dos < $1 > file" > would have to be this: "

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Nick Marino
rder for it to write back to the same file? Correct? - Original Message - From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New Quest

Re: [SAtalk] New Question

2003-01-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:23:56AM -0600, Nick Marino wrote: > Can anyone tell me how to run unix2dos from a shell I would image all output > should be redirected to null as when I run it like unix2dos $1 from my > script it never ends. It just keeps hanging and proccessing never ends. This has ab