On 18 Aug 2004, at 10:30, Jim Maul wrote:
Quoting Jim Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
OK. Tried the -tD. There is says that my Bayes database only has 20
spams
in it. (<200).
But I have had thousands of SPAMS. Apparently, I've only fed 20 of
them for
sa-learn. I seem to recall that there is a
At 12:24 PM 8/18/2004, Jim Coulter wrote:
OK. Tried the -tD. There is says that my Bayes database only has 20 spams
in it. (<200).
But I have had thousands of SPAMS. Apparently, I've only fed 20 of them for
sa-learn. I seem to recall that there is a flag to set for Bayes to pick up
on all Spa
Quoting Jim Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
OK. Tried the -tD. There is says that my Bayes database only has 20 spams
in it. (<200).
But I have had thousands of SPAMS. Apparently, I've only fed 20 of them for
sa-learn. I seem to recall that there is a flag to set for Bayes to pick up
on all Spam
At 11:18 AM 8/18/2004, Jim Coulter wrote:
If I run a message through sa-learn and then run spamassassin -t on the same
message, shouldn't it be recognized as SPAM ?
If I add a teaspoon of red wine to a 50 gallon barrel of clear water,
should the resulting liquid be red?
Depends on the contents of
Matthew Thomas wrote:
>
> While looking into @INC, I saw that sa-learn had a line:
> use lib '/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1'
>
> Which I changed to:
> use lib '/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4'
>
> And this fixed the problem. I don't know if that was The Right Thing
> to do, but it worked.
>
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 09:06:44AM -0700, Matthew Thomas wrote:
> > I tried reinstalling Digest::SHA1 from CPAN, but it said that the
> > module was up to date. I'm using SA 2.64, which I usually
> upgrade via
> > CPAN, also.
> Two options IMO:
>
> 1) "force install Digest::SHA1"
> 2) go th
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 09:06:44AM -0700, Matthew Thomas wrote:
> I tried reinstalling Digest::SHA1 from CPAN, but it said that the module was
> up to date. I'm using SA 2.64, which I usually upgrade via CPAN, also.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?
Two options IMO:
1) "force
David Jiménez Domínguez wrote:
Hi list!
To learn from messages (stored like ham or like posible spam with the tag2
score) to Spam, Have I remove the SA headers??
Saludos.
No. It'll ignore them.
By the way, both of your questions today are FAQs:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesFaq
--
Title: RE: sa-learn question
This happens to me in 2.63, but my machine is underpowered for the amount of traffic I have. If I feed ~500 spams or ~200 hams at one time, bayes.lock gets reset in the middle of sa-learn, sometimes causes the database to become corrupted.
-Original Message
_
From: Brent Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 7/12/2004 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sa-learn question
I usually like to do things manually myself too, but unfortunately I have
2000+ emails in the folder I would like to get learned as spam. I figured
it might help
I run IMAP on the primary SA server and have an account that I use to dump
emails over to it. I connecto to it with my Outlook client and then copy hams
to the ham folder and spams to the spam folder.
I have a script that will take the contents of the ham/spam folders and import
them into b
.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 1:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sa-learn question
Perhaps I'm along but users do dumb things.. I have a "spam" public folder
(we use Outlook) and usually whenever I look
Perhaps I'm along but users do dumb things.. I have a "spam" public folder
(we use Outlook) and usually whenever I look at the contents before
exporting and learning it I can bet money there will be virus alerts,
undeliverables, stuff they accidentally dragged in there etc..
I guess it depends on
ssage-
From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2004 18:31
To: Stephen Gray
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache. Org
Subject: RE: sa-learn
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Stephen Gray wrote:
> The header of the mailbox says *mbx* and a conversion program I ran on it
> identified it as mbo
Kris Deugau wrote:
From: "Stephen Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The mailbox has about 150 e-mails in it but at the end sa-learn
says for example :-
learned from 1 message(s) (3 message(s) examined)
jdow replied:
Aouhm let's see. Is it possible that of the 150 messages only 3 or
them had not been seen
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Stephen Gray wrote:
> The header of the mailbox says *mbx* and a conversion program I ran on it
> identified it as mbox format so I'm not sure. It could of course be in some
> intermediate format that only the imap deamon knows about.
If the first line of the mailbox is just
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Mike Burger wrote:
> My experience has been that you need to use "<" to read in the mailbox
> file:
>
> sa-learn --spam --mbox < mailbox_name
No, you do not need that shell I/O redirector -if- the mailbox
is in standard Unix 'mbox' format. the sa-learn switch '--mbox'
declares
Aouhm let's see. Is it possible that of the 150 messages only 3 or them
had not been seen before and only one of those 3 had anything to learn
from as in they were three duplicated messages?
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello.
>
> The mailbox has
> From: "Stephen Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The mailbox has about 150 e-mails in it but at the end sa-learn
> > says for example :-
> >
> > learned from 1 message(s) (3 message(s) examined)
jdow replied:
> Aouhm let's see. Is it possible that of the 150 messages only 3 or
> them had not been se
ginal Message-
From: Mike Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2004 13:31
To: Stephen Gray
Cc: Andy Norris; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache. Org
Subject: RE: sa-learn
Silly question, but is the mailbox in question a standard mbox format
mailbox, or perhaps some other format?
On Wed, 7 Jul
> To: Stephen Gray
> Cc: Andy Norris; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache. Org
> Subject: RE: sa-learn
>
>
> My experience has been that you need to use "<" to read in the mailbox
> file:
>
> sa-learn --spam --mbox < mailbox_name
>
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Stephen G
Mike Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2004 11:22
To: Stephen Gray
Cc: Andy Norris; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache. Org
Subject: RE: sa-learn
My experience has been that you need to use "<" to read in the mailbox
file:
sa-learn --spam --mbox < mailbox_name
On Wed, 7 Ju
iginal Message-
> From: Andy Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 July 2004 07:14
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sa-learn
>
>
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> sa-learn will only learn from messages it's not already learned f
iving Software
-Original Message-
From: Andy Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2004 07:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sa-learn
Hi Stephen,
sa-learn will only learn from messages it's not already learned from. If
you happen to have run i
Hi Stephen,
sa-learn will only learn from messages it's not already learned from. If
you happen to have run it on these messages already, you're only getting
the new, "unlearned from" messages counted.
sa-learn --spam --mbox mailbox_name
You may need to "unlearn" if you ran it already without th
On Thursday 24 June 2004 20:08, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 12:16 PM 6/24/04 +0545, Bikrant wrote:
> >I did spamassasin -t < msg.1 before and after sa-learn --spam msg.1 but I
> > am getting same result score both the times. Why isn't spamassissin using
> > the spam database that has been created usin
At 12:16 PM 6/24/04 +0545, Bikrant wrote:
I did spamassasin -t < msg.1 before and after sa-learn --spam msg.1 but I am
getting same result score both the times. Why isn't spamassissin using the
spam database that has been created using the sa-learn utility ?
It should be.
I think it should be given
On Thursday 24 June 2004 13:40, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > I did spamassasin -t < msg.1 before and after sa-learn --spam msg.1 but I
>
> am
>
> > getting same result score both the times. Why isn't spamassissin using
> > the spam database that has been created using the sa-learn utility ?
>
> It is.
Thanks for the many advices I got!
I will try the proposed solution with procmail at
http://konabi.de/content.php?action=sa-learn
I think it's really what I was looking for!
Chiara
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 15:55, Markus Welsch wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I hope someone can help me. I've searched google
> I did spamassasin -t < msg.1 before and after sa-learn --spam msg.1 but I
am
> getting same result score both the times. Why isn't spamassissin using the
> spam database that has been created using the sa-learn utility ?
It is. Bayes said this message was ham.
> And, can anyone please tell me
At 09:22 AM 6/23/2004, kler wrote:
We would like to allow users who get spam or ham messages to send
them back the messages to us and run sa-learn through.
Is there a way to make sa-learn analyze only the body of the mail?
(Since the header part comes modified?).
Be careful, the body is likely to b
Hi all,
I hope someone can help me. I've searched google without much chance ...
On a mail server is installed SA 2.63 and we have set up a global bayes
db. We would like to allow users who get spam or ham messages to send
them back the messages to us and run sa-learn through.
Is there a way to ma
sday, June 22, 2004 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sa-learn skips alot of msgs?
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 02:23:29AM +, Steve wrote:
> Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
>
> why would 40 msgs be exculded? they are all spam msgs.
It didn't exclude/skip
At 07:23 PM 6/21/2004, Steve wrote:
Hey, im new to spamassassin but im told this abnormal and to post here,
when I
run sa-learn --mbox --spam /home/freedom/kmail/spam I get:
Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
why would 40 msgs be exculded? they are all spam msgs.
Do you have aut
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 02:23:29 + Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, im new to spamassassin but im told this abnormal and to post here, when
> I
> run sa-learn --mbox --spam /home/freedom/kmail/spam I get:
> Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
>
> why would 40 msgs be exc
On 2004-06-22 02:23:29 +, Steve wrote:
> Hey, im new to spamassassin but im told this abnormal and to post here, when
> I
> run sa-learn --mbox --spam /home/freedom/kmail/spam I get:
> Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
>
> why would 40 msgs be exculded? they are all spam m
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 19:23, Steve wrote:
> why would 40 msgs be exculded? they are all spam msgs.
Has the mailbox been learned before? sa-learn only learns from a given
message once.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Internal Systems Administrator
Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey, im new to spamassassin but im told this abnormal and to post here, when
> I
> run sa-learn --mbox --spam /home/freedom/kmail/spam I get:
> Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
>
> why would 40 msgs be exculded? they are all spam msgs.
May
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 02:23:29AM +, Steve wrote:
> Learned from 11 message(s) (40 message(s) examined).
>
> why would 40 msgs be exculded? they are all spam msgs.
It didn't exclude/skip 40, it skipped 29 (40-11). As for why, it'll do
that if you've already learned the message (autolearn fo
It doesn't work, still update the file in Home directory :(
Mensaje citado por Duncan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 21 June 2004 05:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] might have
> typed:
> > Hi list!!
>
> > So, SpamAssassin is reading the files into /var/amavis/.spamassassin, BUT
> > when an user run
ge-
> From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:36 PM
> To: Steve Dimoff
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sa-learn --spam didnt work properly for me or?
>
>
> nope, heres on marked as spam:
>
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Checker
naive-Bayesian-style classifier built into SpamAssassin.
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:36 PM
To: Steve Dimoff
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sa-learn --spam didnt work properly for me or?
nope, heres on marked as spam:
X-Spam-Flag:
Status: R
X-Status: N
On Monday 21 June 2004 13:08, you wrote:
> On message that did get marked for SPAM, do you have bayes score there?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:16 PM
> To: Steve Dimoff
> Cc: [EMA
On message that did get marked for SPAM, do you have bayes score there?
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:16 PM
To: Steve Dimoff
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sa-learn --spam didnt work properly for me or?
ok no I dont have a
e case? or do you not even have a bayes score in there?
>
> Steve
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 8:45 PM
> To: Steve Dimoff
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sa-learn --spam didnt work properly for me
CTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 8:45 PM
To: Steve Dimoff
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sa-learn --spam didnt work properly for me or?
Ok but what I do is I tell sa-learn to learn from all these spam messages, I
then in kmail, reapply the filters (run the emails through spamd again) on
the spam I
Ok but what I do is I tell sa-learn to learn from all these spam messages, I
then in kmail, reapply the filters (run the emails through spamd again) on
the spam I just told sa to learn and then some msgs are still marked as not
spam? shouldnt it now detect, expcially the excat same msg I told it
I don't know anything about kmail, but sa-learn from what I know of it; it
doesn't change any messages.
sa-learn is used to "teach" the bayes database for known SPAM/HAM.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 6:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
On Monday 21 June 2004 05:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] might have
typed:
> Hi list!!
> So, SpamAssassin is reading the files into /var/amavis/.spamassassin, BUT
> when an user run sa-learn, the files that SpamAssassin uses or creates are
> in the HOME directory ~/.spamassassin/bayes_*
>
> So, How c
At 05:25 PM 6/9/2004, mazur wrote:
There isn't a ham
file to analyze if users are draining the mail files?!
I could see if I were running a IMAP server, but like many, I am not.
So what do you do?
My solution is to use "hamtraps"... I create some bogus accounts, subscribe
them to some legitimate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 14:25, mazur wrote:
> I use SpamAssassin and everything works pretty well. I am also asking
> the Bayesian Classifier to learn using sa-learn, and pointing it to
> my resulting spam file.
>
> But, this machine runs a pop ser
Hi,
On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 10:24:40 -0400 Rick Macdougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Gilbert wrote:
> > Nick Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> I'm posting this again as I've had no response:
> >>
> >> I'm getting this error from spamassassin when running sa-learn:
> >>
> >> Use of uninitialized value i
Nick Gilbert wrote:
I've *still* had no reply to this message and I now see that another
user is getting the same message and also had no reply. Am I posting to
the wrong userlist or something?
Nick...
Nick Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
I'm posting this again as I've had no response:
I'm getting this erro
I've *still* had no reply to this message and I now see that another
user is getting the same message and also had no reply. Am I posting to
the wrong userlist or something?
Nick...
Nick Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
I'm posting this again as I've had no response:
I'm getting this error from spamassassin w
At 05:12 PM 3/18/2004, Hou, Ming wrote:
I have done "spamassassin -D < a_spam_message", it told me:
debug: is spam? score=5.368 required=4.3 tests=ADDR
That's not what I asked about.. I asked what bayes score it got.. not what
spamassassin score it got.
Which BAYES_ rule matched? BAYES_99??
I
ge from yahoo.com to my SpamAssassin box, the "hits" is only 1.6.
Why?
Thank you.
ming
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Hou, Ming; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sa-learn with spam
At 04:45 PM 3/18/2004, Hou, M
At 04:45 PM 3/18/2004, Hou, Ming wrote:
I am wondering when I use "sa-learn --rebuild --spam a_spam_message", then
"sa-learn --rebuild". sa-learn printed "Learned from 1 message...", and I
assumed that SpamAssassin 2.63 will learn this spam by saving to Bayesian
database. Then, I sent "a_spam_me
>> I'm looking for a way to grab spam and ham from Exchange
>> users to run through sa-learn. Originally, I was thinking
>This is exactly what we do, via perl, it can access public folders no
>problem.
>I tweaked mine a bit, but it is based on:
>http://tirian.magd.ox.ac.uk/~nick/code/
I use
> -Original Message-
> From: Rice, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 1:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: sa-learn and Exchange
>
> I'm looking for a way to grab spam and ham from Exchange
> users to run through sa-learn. Originally, I was thinkin
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Rice, Kevin wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to grab spam and ham from Exchange users to run
> through sa-learn. Originally, I was thinking that having them move the
> messages to public folders and using IMAP to pick up the messages might be
> the best bet, but it looks like Mi
Well turns out that if you have "use_bayes"
turned off in your config file, sa-learn fails
with the below symptom. I thought we'd run for a while with
bayes off while I was "teaching" the bayes filters,
but I guess not.
Sorry all!
-glenn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A different adm
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:44:41PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can anyone see what I'm missing? Or how to get further info? I tried
> "truss", but if there was any useful info there it was lost in the
> noise.
You have DB_File installed and functioning, correct?
--
Randomly Generated Tag
At 02:42 PM 3/11/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly is the negative effect of having a ham corpus that
is much larger than a spam corpus? Say we initialize both corpii (?)
with equal amounts of spam and ham. However, with the majority
of email being non-spam (or at least non-super-high-s
From: "Martin Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> which says, amongst other things:
>
> Exchange 2000/3 can expose the mailbox store as folders containing
> EML files (this is called IFS of Installable File System). These
> files are the same in content as those commonly found in legacy
> mai
(Oops, I forgot to copy the list. Sorry for the echo, Mark).
Mark A. DeMichele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if I can get rid of the white space in the file
> names it would work, I guess.
I think so... assuming that there aren't more MH-specific features in the
actual file format that might
27;s users. I feel so lonely.
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 7:06 PM
> To: Mark A. DeMichele; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SA-Learn and Windows long file names
>
>
> Mark A. D
Mark A. DeMichele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The question I have is why is sa-learn excluding files
> using this grep:
>
> { /^[^,.]\S*$/ }
>
> This is clear not a good idea in my case when apparently the
> files match this. It would be nice to know what the intent was.
Warning: SA newbie res
rom: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 9:59 PM
> To: Mark A. DeMichele; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: SA-Learn and Windows long file names
>
> Exchange doesn't store messages in Active Directory - it stores them in an
> Exchange databas
a while back but got no response. I figured I try
again.
From: Mark A. DeMichele
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 10:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SA-Learn and Windows long file names
Ok, I stepped trough the sa-learn code with a debugge
Sam Halliday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - when running `sa-learn` on an mbox file, must i first strip
>all the spamassassin markups? or does it deal with those
> automatically?
Per the manpage: Messages learnt as spam will have SpamAssassin markup removed,
on the fly.
> - is there any w
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:08:51PM -0700, Alan Baxter wrote:
> without elaborating. What's the argument to not ignore "use_bayes 0".
I was hoping for others to make comments, but ...
Basically, "use_bayes 0" means don't do bayes. It's the literal meaning,
so having some tool kluge around it is
Oh, BTW, the problem with running sa-learn on my windows machine was
that I didn't have use_bayes set to 1 in my local.cf file. I thought
you only needed that for the spam checking, not the learning.
Title: SA-Learn and Windows long file names
Ok, I stepped trough the sa-learn code
with a debugger and discovered that my e-mail files are getting “grepped”
out. Unfortunately, I’m not very good at regular expressions
yet. Can someone explain please. The problem is in the
scan_directory
Butrus orman wrote:
is there a way to see what it learned?
Per the sa-learn manpage:
--dump [all|data|magic] Display the contents of the Bayes data
base
Give that a shot and see if it gives what you want.
- Bob
* Jason Crowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:02:26:08:40:08-0600] scribed:
> I am going to guess that you recently upgraded to perl 5.8. This is what
> happened to me when I upgraded. I never found a fix.
No, I have been running 5.8x for many months.
Also, no, this one (1) message throws an error; but
On Friday February 20 2004 09:06, Mark A. DeMichele wrote:
> I've been using SA for about a month now without bayes. I think I'm
> ready to try it. I have a question though. Right now my SA is set up
> to modify messages it thinks are spams to have the original message in
> an attachment. Is S
At 09:06 AM 2/20/2004, Mark A. DeMichele wrote:
I've been using SA for about a month now without bayes. I think I'm
ready to try it. I have a question though. Right now my SA is set up to
modify messages it thinks are spams to have the original message in an
attachment. Is SA-Learn smart en
At 06:06 PM 2/19/04 -0800, Chris Johnston wrote:
Hello. After digging a bit through the archives, I still have had
little success in finding out why I cannot do something like this:
sa-learn --spam < 0-SPAMHOLD
0-SPAMHOLD is a folder in my imap account on my server.
Um.. redirecting folders is in
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:06:07 -0800, Chris Johnston wrote:
>Hello. After digging a bit through the archives, I still have had
>little success in finding out why I cannot do something like this:
>
> sa-learn --spam < 0-SPAMHOLD
>
>0-SPAMHOLD is a folder in my imap account on my server. This allows
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Chris Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sa-learn --spam < 0-SPAMHOLD
>
> However, I noticed that only the first message is being learned and not
> the other messages glued into that large text file.
Add --mbox if that is in mbox format (i.e. contains more than one messa
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:44:01AM +0100, Muenz, Michael wrote:
> I've "tuned" my bayes_db today with 8 undetected spams with sa-learn.
> I'm running SA with amavisd-new and didn't stopped it cause i thought
> 8 mails won't take to much time. After sa-learn finished I've watched the
> log
> and saw
At 12:43 PM 2/17/2004, jdow wrote:
From: "Mike McMullen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi All,
>
> I just installed SpamAssassin recently. I had a spam
> mailfolder in mbox format but I fed it to sa-learn with
> out specifying mbox format.
>
> I also did this with a ham folder too.
>
> How badly does this
From: "Mike McMullen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi All,
>
> I just installed SpamAssassin recently. I had a spam
> mailfolder in mbox format but I fed it to sa-learn with
> out specifying mbox format.
>
> I also did this with a ham folder too.
>
> How badly does this muck up the database and what
Hi Martin,
> On my system, "-d" does remove all the markup, including converting
> the attachment back to be the main body of the mail. Which version of
> SA are you running?
2.63 and I can't reproduce it anymore. Strange!
Well, at least it's working now. :-)
Thanks for your answer,
Andy.
--
At Thu Feb 5 13:17:27 2004, Andy Spiegl wrote:
>
> The manpage for sa-learn says:
>Messages learnt as spam will have SpamAssassin markup removed, on the fly.
>
> Is this true for the new mime-attachments style, too?
Yes.
> I am wondering because the manpage for spamassassin says:
> -d,
85 matches
Mail list logo
