[spambayes-dev] require subscription?

2004-12-02 Thread Seth Goodman
would argue for requiring it for both lists. -- Seth Goodman ___ spambayes-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev

RE: [spambayes-dev] require subscription?

2004-12-02 Thread Seth Goodman
while they are having the problem. <...> > > I don't feel that the Mailman subscribe/confirmation process > > would really scare anybody away, > > I do. Your list, your rules. I think I'll follow your advise and stop filtering the lists. -- Seth Goodman

RE: [spambayes-dev] require subscription?

2004-12-03 Thread Seth Goodman
> From: Barry Warsaw > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 9:10 AM > > > On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 02:32, Seth Goodman wrote: > > > Automatic posts to the list makes it unwise to require subscription. I > > didn't realize you had that feature as I use the Outlook plug

RE: [spambayes-dev] require subscription?

2004-12-06 Thread Seth Goodman
Z would be best, > probably) here feels that moderation is worth a go, speak up and > we can see what the results are. I'd be willing to help out. I'm in the central U.S. -0600 time zone, so I don't know how that works out for you. -- Seth Goodman

RE: [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] Re: Training empty messagesproblem

2004-12-16 Thread Seth Goodman
r of mailboxes (including zero and one), and ending with a semicolon. Because the list of mailboxes can be empty, using the group construct is also a simple way to communicate to recipients that the message was sent to one or more named sets of recipients, without actually providing the individual mailbox address for each of those recipients. " -- Seth Goodman ___ spambayes-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev

RE: [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] Re: Training empty messagesproblem

2004-12-16 Thread Seth Goodman
#x27;t remember mentioning anything about comments presented by > Outlook in the address string. The comments came from Tony's first pass > at simulating the address headers for an Exchange e-mail address, Sorry if I misinterpreted this. I thought that Outlook passed you an address string t

RE: [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] Re: Training empty messagesproblem

2004-12-17 Thread Seth Goodman
> From: Tony Meyer > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 7:32 PM <...> > [Seth Goodman] > >> Another general question on standards compliance is does > >> Spambayes support the Resent-*: series of headers? These are > >> neither generated nor displayed b

RE: [spambayes-dev] sb_mailsort.py status

2005-01-10 Thread Seth Goodman
in addition to giving the spammer a second chance to get their payload delivered. -- Seth Goodman ___ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev

RE: [spambayes-dev] sb_mailsort.py status

2005-01-10 Thread Seth Goodman
ses on spam that you haven't confirmed are good during the SMTP session can easily turn you into a spam reflector. Even if the envelope return addresses on spam are valid, they are likely to be joe-job forgeries, so you still don't want to send DSN's in response to spam. --

RE: [spambayes-dev] sb_mailsort.py status

2005-01-10 Thread Seth Goodman
down. If you refuse a connection at your secondary MX and they don't retry at your primary, you can be pretty sure it wasn't real mail. -- Seth Goodman ___ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev

RE: [spambayes-dev] Dialogs.rc TRANSLATION

2005-01-19 Thread Seth Goodman
> From: Kenny Pitt > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:49 PM <...> > The latest CVS version of dialogs.rc should contain only English (U.S.) > resources. I checked in an update a week or two ago to change all the > Australia resources back to U.S. Thanks for doing the t

Re: [spambayes-dev] Experience with Word Pairs

2005-09-01 Thread Seth Goodman
that might paralyze sections of the internet. Their analysis calculates the number of tarpits necessary to neutralize a wide-scale TCP-based attack, and the number is surprisingly small. They are, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration would say, "safe and effective when used as direct

Re: [spambayes-dev] How about a 1.1a3 release?

2006-08-20 Thread Seth Goodman
in2K/Office2K for quite a while, yet. I'd be willing to obtain a copy of Outlook2K for someone. Does this mean shipping to NZ? -- Seth Goodman not in NZ ___ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev

Re: [spambayes-dev] Ancient spambayes-dev messages popping up, maybe via spamlab.co.uk?

2006-09-26 Thread Seth Goodman
s-dev> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL, > BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.70-cvs > List-Post: <mailto:spambayes-dev@python.org> > In-Reply-To: Message from "Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> of > "

Re: [spambayes-dev] FAQ 6.5

2007-01-01 Thread Seth Goodman
that it turns your MTA into a spam reflector, which will properly get you blacklisted for abuse. -- Seth Goodman ___ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev

[spambayes-dev] was [Spambayes] date for new release to handle image spam?

2007-02-02 Thread Seth Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, February 02, 2007 9:23 AM -0600: > Seth Goodman wrote: > > > The word salad they use to drown out significant clues generally > > fails, but if they throw enough words at it, they sometimes dilute > > the spam clues sufficiently.

Re: [spambayes-dev] was [Spambayes] date for new release to handleimage spam?

2007-02-03 Thread Seth Goodman
rom the overall score. Using meta-information is a little scary, since the underlying tokens already contribute to the overall spam score. I think the trick is to devise meta-tokens that describe overall message characteristics and are relatively independent of individual token scores. -

Re: [spambayes-dev] was date for new release ...

2007-02-04 Thread Seth Goodman
, and I vaguely recall two of them. If you want to support arbitrary real values, these are all floats, with the possibility that the intermediate variables are double precision. -- Seth Goodman ___ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev