Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.3 not allowing?

2008-08-27 Thread Michael Colvin
As Rosanna Rosannadanna would say, Never mind. ;) -- You're dating yourself. :-) I'm probably one of only a few that even get that. :-P Michael J. Colvin NorCal Internet Services www.norcalisp.com ___ spamdyke-users mailing list

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.3 logging

2008-08-27 Thread Sam Clippinger
I'm not that familiar with splogger but a quick search gave me several pages that all say it sends its messages to syslog in addition to passing them through stdout/stderr. http://www.ezmlm.org/man/man8/splogger.8.html Of course it's possible this is a spamdyke bug but the way you've described

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.3 not allowing?

2008-08-27 Thread Sam Clippinger
Good to hear it's working... I guess there just weren't any good messages being delivered while you were testing filter-level? By the way, setting the filter-level option in the global config file is not really what I had in mind when I created that flag. Since it overrides all other flags,

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.3 not allowing?

2008-08-27 Thread Eric Shubert
Sam Clippinger wrote: Good to hear it's working... I guess there just weren't any good messages being delivered while you were testing filter-level? That's what I'm thinking. I'm still seeing something a little peculiar though. I would expect every smtp session to generate a spamdyke message

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.3 logging

2008-08-27 Thread Eric Shubert
I think I've taken splogger out of the picture. I have qmail-send messages going to the (proper) /var/log/qmail/send/current file via multilog. The qmail logs look ok now. However, the spamdyke messages are still going to both the smtpd/current log, as well as /var/log/maillog. Any idea how that