Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.3 not allowing?

2008-08-28 Thread Sam Clippinger
No, that wouldn't be a huge deal. I'll add it to my TODO list. -- Sam Clippinger Eric Shubert wrote: > That's pretty much what I figured. I've kept a little closer eye on it this > morning (just visual monitoring), and it seems to be rejecting nearly > everything properly. Maybe a couple instanc

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.3 not allowing?

2008-08-28 Thread Eric Shubert
That's pretty much what I figured. I've kept a little closer eye on it this morning (just visual monitoring), and it seems to be rejecting nearly everything properly. Maybe a couple instances where the session ends with status 0 and no message from spamdyke. Would it be possible to add a 'sender d

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.3 logging

2008-08-28 Thread Sam Clippinger
Seems to be a bug. When "log-target=stderr" is given on the command line, it works correctly. When it is given in a configuration file, it sends output to both stderr and syslog. My test scripts don't check for that particular problem, apparently. I'll get on it. Thanks for reporting this!

Re: [spamdyke-users] Best way to deal with returned emails not sent by user

2008-08-28 Thread Sam Clippinger
I'm not sure how spamdyke can help prevent backscatter. The bounce messages are coming from legitimate mail servers that are not likely to be blacklisted, are very likely to have correct rDNS records and will retry delivery (defeating graylisting). That pretty much eliminates most of spamdyke

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke 4.0.3 not allowing?

2008-08-28 Thread Sam Clippinger
spamdyke won't log anything if a remote client disconnects without identifying a sender or recipient. Prior to version 4.0, it wouldn't log anything if a message was delivered with TLS but that's been fixed. I can't think of any other situation where a delivery (or rejection) would not create

Re: [spamdyke-users] Best way to deal with returned emails not sent by user

2008-08-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Shane Bywater wrote: > Hi, > I'm wondering what the best way is (hopefully by using Spamdyke) to > deal with the thousands of mailer-daemon messages that are sometimes > received by a user who was unfortunate to have a spammer use their email > address in the From: line to send out SPAM.

[spamdyke-users] Best way to deal with returned emails not sent by user

2008-08-28 Thread Shane Bywater
Hi, I'm wondering what the best way is (hopefully by using Spamdyke) to deal with the thousands of mailer-daemon messages that are sometimes received by a user who was unfortunate to have a spammer use their email address in the From: line to send out SPAM. Of course any undeliverable