Re: [spamdyke-users] getting DENIED_RDNS_MISSING with valid rDNS

2008-08-11 Thread slamp slamp
hmm, i wonder why v3.1.8 works fine then. anyway i will try this when i get home and give you feedback. thanks for this great app! On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, your /etc/resolv.conf should list specific IP addresses for your nameservers. The

Re: [spamdyke-users] getting DENIED_RDNS_MISSING with valid rDNS

2008-08-11 Thread Sam Clippinger
Version 3.1.8 works with 0.0.0.0 because it uses the system resolver library to parse /etc/resolv.conf and apparently the library ignores the invalid 0.0.0.0 entry. Version 4.0.x parses /etc/resolv.conf itself and it doesn't ignore that entry. I'll fix that in the next version though... --

Re: [spamdyke-users] Illegal value for multiple options and rejecting all SMTP connections

2008-08-11 Thread Shane Bywater
Hi, I tried increasing my qmail's softlimit to 8000 as per Sam's recommendation but that didn't help. Same errors are reported and all SMTP connections are rejected. I'm guessing I may be the only one running Spamdyke 4.0.2 on a FreeBSD 4.7 server so this is why no one else

Re: [spamdyke-users] getting DENIED_RDNS_MISSING with valid rDNS

2008-08-11 Thread slamp slamp
it works now with resolv.conf set to 127.0.0.1. is there a downside to running spamdyke binary compiled with +EXCESSIVE and full-log-dir turned off? On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Version 3.1.8 works with 0.0.0.0 because it uses the system resolver