Re: [spamdyke-users] IPv6 Question

2016-05-05 Thread BC via spamdyke-users
That is what I figured. Thanks, Sam. On 5/5/2016 6:30 AM, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote: Right now, spamdyke has no support for IPv6 at all, so it can't understand that nameserver line. However, the only consequence should be that error message -- it shouldn't have any trouble

Re: [spamdyke-users] IPv6 Question

2016-05-05 Thread Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users
Right now, spamdyke has no support for IPv6 at all, so it can't understand that nameserver line. However, the only consequence should be that error message -- it shouldn't have any trouble skipping that line and using the IPv4 nameserver. -- Sam Clippinger On May 4, 2016, at 2:54 PM, BC

[spamdyke-users] IPv6 Question

2016-05-04 Thread BC via spamdyke-users
Using FreeBSD here. In addition to my normal IPv4 connection, I have an IPv6 tunnel set up via Hurricane Electric. Also use unbound as my local DNS cache resolver for resolving both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses and it has been doing both for over a year now. spamdyke doesn't seem to like the