Re: [spamdyke-users] IPv6 Question

2016-05-05 Thread BC via spamdyke-users


That is what I figured.  Thanks, Sam.

On 5/5/2016 6:30 AM, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
Right now, spamdyke has no support for IPv6 at all, so it can't 
understand that nameserver line.  However, the only consequence 
should be that error message -- it shouldn't have any trouble 
skipping that line and using the IPv4 nameserver.


___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


Re: [spamdyke-users] IPv6 Question

2016-05-05 Thread Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users
Right now, spamdyke has no support for IPv6 at all, so it can't understand that 
nameserver line.  However, the only consequence should be that error message -- 
it shouldn't have any trouble skipping that line and using the IPv4 nameserver.

-- Sam Clippinger




On May 4, 2016, at 2:54 PM, BC via spamdyke-users  
wrote:

> 
> Using FreeBSD here.
> 
> In addition to my normal IPv4 connection, I have an IPv6 tunnel set up via 
> Hurricane Electric.  Also use unbound as my local DNS cache resolver for 
> resolving both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses and it has been doing both for over a 
> year now.
> 
> spamdyke doesn't seem to like the IPv6 resolver.  /var/log/maillog showing 
> LOTS of lines like this (log-level=info):
> 
> May  4 13:08:56 Xeon_Right spamdyke[18382]: 
> ERROR(load_resolver_file()@search_fs.c:753): invalid/unparsable nameserver 
> found: fd00::1
> 
> My /etc/resolv.conf file contains these two lines:
> 
> nameserver 10.0.0.1
> nameserver fd00::1
> 
> I didn't think that spamdyke is IPv6 aware?  Shouldn't it ignore the second 
> nameserver line above?
> 
> In hopes of getting some more info about this, I've set log-level=excessive.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> ___
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users