I was able to fix it by recompiling. It was necessary. Before that,
not only were there thousands of spamdyke processes, also there was no
spamdyke logging and I suspect no rejecting.
All is well now. Thanks for a great product.
Still wondering what we are to use for encryption now that SSLv3 is
vulnerable. What are most people doing? Leaving the submission port
vulnerable by leaving SSLv3 available and securing all the rest of the
ports?Or just giving up on email encryption.
-- Original Message --
From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Sent: 10/30/2014 5:00:43 PM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] New problems with spamdyke
On 10/29/2014 03:40 PM, Les Fenison wrote:
I have been running spamdyke for years and never had a problem until
today. I am running version spamdyke 5.0.0+TLS+CONFIGTEST+DEBUG. What
is happening is that the number of spamdyke processes will rise up to
over 1000 in just a few minutes time. This all started when I patched
my server for Poodle.. So, I removed my patches and put everything
back but spamdyke continues to have a growing number of processes.
The other thing that happened just before this started is that centos
came out with a huge update to 6.6. Does spamdyke have problems with
CentOS 6.6? Any idea why these processes are growing rapidly out of
control?
Les Fenison
www.DeltaTechnicalServices.com
https://www.deltatechnicalservices.com
l...@deltatechnicalservices.com
(503) 610-8747
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Just stabbing in the dark here.
Did you recompile spamdyke after the 6.6 upgrade? (Not that you should
need to)
Does the configtest pass?
-- -Eric 'shubes'
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
