; >
> > On 9 Jun 2014, at 19:21, ARMSTON John <
> john.arms...@science.dsitia.qld.gov.au> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Zhan,
> > >
> > > Agree that maximum intensity is a better general choice for waveforms,
> for the Reigl as well.
> > >
> > &
l as well.
> >
> > The quicklook generation code does not have configurable options. Easiest
> > solution is to just change it to maximum.
> > Pete - you have any objections to this? I've changed the source code
> > (SPDFileWrite.cpp) - so will commit if not.
>
.cpp) - so will commit if not.
> >
> > cheers,
> > John.
> >
> > From: Zhan Li [mailto:zhanli1...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, 8 June 2014 8:13 AM
> > To: spdlib-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [spdlib-develop] Use pulse maximum intensity to
mit if not.
>
> cheers,
> John.
>
> From: Zhan Li [mailto:zhanli1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, 8 June 2014 8:13 AM
> To: spdlib-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [spdlib-develop] Use pulse maximum intensity to create quick look
> image
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
After I created a spd file from ENVI data cube with a python file and
inspected it as an HDF5 file with Matlab's hdf5 functions, the quick look
image is not right. All the pixel values are simply 1. How should I create
the quick look image with python bindings of spdlib?
Also in Pete's paper
