>> Instead, they rely on the fact that they inherit the global, project-wide
>> license as defined in the top
>> level README and COPYING files.
Although a global license file is a commonly used approach, I would categorize
it as a "bad" practice from a license compliance perspective. It is ana
Hello Wolfgang,
>- Original Message -
>From: Wolfgang Denk
>To: spdx-t...@lists.spdx.org; spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
>Cc: "Meier, Roger"
>Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 4:09 AM
>Subject: SPDX meta-tag for implicit license terms
>
>Hello,
>
>after converting the U-Boot project to use SP
Hi,
As far as I under stood the standard one would express this kind of association
(file without license information - is assumed to be licensed under the
"conluded" license of the package) with the following elements on file level:
LicenseInfoInFile: NONE
License concluded: SPDX Identifier of
Hello,
after converting the U-Boot project to use SPDX meta-tags, we now
started working on another Open Source project; here we face a
somewhat different situation: a large number of the individual source
files do not contain any per-file license header at all. Instead,
they rerely on the fact
