RE: New OSI-approved licenses

Jilayne: > That sounds like a reasonable result, all things considered. I agree. In fact, I think listing both "0BSD" and "FPL-1.0.0" is a great solution, especially if the SPDX website includes notices with each similar to the text at https://opensource.org/licenses/FPL-1.0.0: > Note: There

Re: New OSI-approved licenses

On 12/17/2015 12:38 PM, J Lovejoy wrote: > That sounds like a reasonable result, all things considered. I don't care what OSI does. > I’ll add a note to the Notes field of Zero Clause BSD License > to the same effect on the upcoming release of the SPDX License List. Please don't. Pretty please?

Re: Github issue templates

Thanks for this, Brad. I’ll make a note to add this to the general topic and proposal in the New Year! Jilayne SPDX Legal Team co-lead opensou...@jilayne.com > On Dec 10, 2015, at 12:12 PM, Brad Edmondson wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'm mostly a lurker on these