RE: New License/Exception Request: EPL-2.0

Regarding EPL-2.0 at ... Richard Fontana: > I think you're right about the intent. The  annoying thing here is the > ceremonial wording of Exhibit A says nothing about compatibility as such and > instead seems to merely express the traditional concept of

Re: New License/Exception Request: EPL-2.0

I think you're right about the intent. The annoying thing here is the ceremonial wording of Exhibit A says nothing about compatibility as such and instead seems to merely express the traditional concept of a dual license (which admittedly is one way to achieve compatibility), which has a well

Re: New License/Exception Request: EPL-2.0

Most folks on this list are a lot more hands-on with these issues than I, but I’ve studied it a little so will risk tossing in my 2 cents. I conclude that the EPL-2.0 introduces a new concept not correctly handled by any of current operators and therefore requires a new operator. I don’t have a