On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:31:07AM -0700, J Lovejoy wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses
And they have an official position on the javierwilson/tonto case,
where the GPL-3.0 text is in LICENSE, but no other file in the
repository contains copyright or licensing
(top-posting, as this part isn’t directly related)
It just occurred to me that how SPDX currently has the identifiers: plain
GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ is the same pattern that Fedora uses: they have a slightly
different nomenclature, but also have a “plain” identifier and the + version:
GPLv2 and
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:19:31AM +0100, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> I think that whatever is done on the SPDX side to be
> precise vs. being accurate-enough and good-enough will unlikely ever
> be adopted as the magnitude of the education and changes required
> would be immense…
Backwards
