:23 PM
To: Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office)
Cc: Manbeck, Jack; Jilayne Lovejoy; spdx-t...@lists.spdx.org; SPDX-biz;
SPDX-legal
Subject: Re: meta-tag page
Dear Scott,
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office)
scott.lam...@hp.commailto:scott.lam...@hp.com
:14 PM
To: Jilayne Lovejoy; Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office)
Cc: spdx-t...@lists.spdx.org; SPDX-biz; SPDX-legal
Subject: RE: meta-tag page
Coming back to a higher level... What is the purpose of this page? We need
to be very clear on this. In my mind it is to propose a best practice
A google search for 4suite license yields the following URL...
http://www.stlinux.com/node/142
From: spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org
[mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of Dennis Clark
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 12:03 PM
To: spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
Subject: 4Suite
Has there been any thought or discussion on supporting this license in SPDX?
According to this post, it seems to be getting some traction on github.
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.law.unlicense
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
: The unlicense
Hi,
Le 31/07/2013 16:41, Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office) a écrit :
Has there been any thought or discussion on supporting this license in SPDX?
Yes
http://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-legal/2012-December/000723.html
According to this post, it seems to be getting some traction
We came across this license in a recent open source review. Fossology
mis-identified this as GPL which is clearly a bug and it's being fixed.
However, my question is... would this match any existing SPDX license?
- Copyright (C) 2001 XXX. All rights reserved.
- This software is
