Sorry for the "Reply" instead of "Reply all". The answer to
Patrice-Emmanuel's question may interest other members. Please find it
below:
-- Forwarded message -
De : Sihem Ben Sassi
Date: jeu. 16 mars 2023 à 21:43
Subject: Re: Open source licensing discovery
pare-software-licenses>
?
Le jeu. 15 déc. 2022 à 21:56, Sihem Ben Sassi a
écrit :
> Dear Spdx-legal community,
>
> Improving open source licensing discovery and automating licenses
> processing are shared aims. From my side,and as first step, I am coming up
> with a unified descrip
;
> https://www.osadl.org/fileadmin/checklists/unreflicenses/LGPL-2.1-or-later.txt
>
> On 2022-12-15 21:56, Sihem Ben Sassi wrote:
> > Dear Spdx-legal community,
> >
> > Improving open source licensing discovery and automating licenses
> > processing are share
Hi Pierre and Jonas,
Thank you Pierre for answering the feedback questionnaire.
I call the other spdx-legal members to do so!
Below are my answers.
- I don't see any reference in your paper about https://tldrlegal.com/
> which is clearly a prior art to your project, and which provides very
>
Quoting Pierre Tardy (2022-12-16 09:51:52)
> - The web site of the tool shows it is licensed under AGPLv3 which as far
> as I understand requires you to provide the source code. I couldn't find
> any link or reference to it. I would be interested in diving into your data
> model
AGPL defines
