.el...@arm.com]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 10:23
To: Kris.re <kris...@bbhmedia.com>; 'SPDX-legal' <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org>;
spdx-t...@lists.spdx.org
Subject: RE: Markup proposal
The Such and So License
Copyright (c) 2015 Foo Bars
License text
How to apply thi
The Such and So License
Copyright (c) 2015 Foo Bars
License text
How to apply this license:
May I ask what is the benefit of separating body and footer? I can appreciate
that licenses sometimes come without the "How to apply this license" text; if
the reason is to allow the
.@arm.com>;
'SPDX-legal' <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org>; spdx-t...@lists.spdx.org
Subject: RE: Markup proposal
I like the idea of an attribute type in the element optional (e.g. mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org>
[mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of Kris.re
Sent: Fri
I like the idea of an attribute type in the element optional (e.g. mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of Kris.re
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 8:03 AM
To: Sam Ellis; 'SPDX-legal'; spdx-t...@lists.spdx.org
Subject: RE: Markup proposal
Basically, is fine for all the optional
” of
the XML)
-Kris
From: Yev Bronshteyn [mailto:ybronsht...@blackducksoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 12:48
To: Kris.re <kris...@bbhmedia.com>; 'SPDX-legal' <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org>;
spdx-t...@lists.spdx.org
Subject: Re: Markup proposal
Kris,
The proposal is
Hi Kris,
Thanks for writing up such thorough proposal. This will make it much easier
to discuss some of the specifics.
A couple quick items - you mentioned that you could not find the syntax for
the current text. It is in the SPDX specification PDF file
-t...@lists.spdx.org
Subject: RE: Markup proposal
Hey, thanks for the references. I'm sorry if I seem to be ignoring existing
practices - a lot of the existing workflow and use cases I just don't have
much of a conception of.
I very much agree that the human-maintained data should be kept
