The call yesterday revealed to me that there are *two* kinds of license version
ambiguity in SPDX license expressions.
I don't know if this is actually a problem, or if it is, that solving it is
worth the trouble. For many people the "second kind" is probably immaterial.
However, I want to
Gary @ sourceauditor.com:
> Since "-" is an allowed character for a license ID, it would be more
> challenging to write a parser for the "-only" operator since we would have to
> determine if the "-" is part of the ID or is part of the operator. BTW "+"
> is not
> allowed in the license ID and
