Greeting legal and tech team,
Following up on last week's legal call, Alan Tse and I discussed using some
of the license diff features as part of the license submittal process. This
resulted in a new project idea:
https://wiki.spdx.org/view/GSOC/GSOC_ProjectIdeas#Enhanced_Workflow_for_Onli
that looks great!
Jilayne
> On Jan 18, 2019, at 10:30 AM, Gary O'Neall wrote:
>
> Greeting legal and tech team,
>
> Following up on last week’s legal call, Alan Tse and I discussed using some
> of the license diff features as part of the license submittal process. This
> resulted in a new
Dear J. Lovejoy,
On 11.01.19 23:31, J Lovejoy wrote:
Hi Elmar,
It appears that you are still in the OSI review/approval process and as
a result the license has evolved a bit. We are tracking it for
submission to SPDX here -
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/692 - but as the
Full Name: Link To My SoundCloud Public License
Short Identifier: LTMSCPL
URL: https://github.com/joelotter/ltmscpl
This license is NOT OSI-approved and it has NOT been submitted for approval
to the OSI.
This license is highly permissive and ensures that the author's music is
proliferated
On 16.01.19 01:25, J Lovejoy wrote:
Thanks for the update, Elmar.
So, the “old” versions that you’ve created along the way for the OSI approval
process are not being used in the wild, is that right? It seems like the
versioning is more about the different updates you’ve made in response to
