Thanks Philippe for pointing this out. Some of these errors were introduced when we updated the templates for a new website look.
I always visually check the pages, but I'll add running them through a validator to the checklist when we update the site. I hope to get these corrected in the next day or so. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: spdx-boun...@lists.spdx.org [mailto:spdx-boun...@lists.spdx.org] > On Behalf Of Philippe Ombredanne > Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 6:45 AM > To: SPDX-legal > Cc: SPDX-general > Subject: Re: SPDX License List v2.4 released > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:40 AM, J Lovejoy <opensou...@jilayne.com> > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Version 2.4 of the SPDX License List is now available in the usual > places. > > We added 9 new licenses for this release, including some > international > > licenses and newly-approved by the OSI. http://spdx.org/licenses/ > > > > You will also notice a new look to the license list pages - this is > > part of the new website revamp. You will see the new look on the > rest > > of the pages soon! > > Excellent! > Note that none of the generated files are valid HTML. > See http://spdx.org/licenses/Glide for instance With the .html > extension, the browsers deal with the quirks somehow: > http://spdx.org/licenses/Glide.html > > So this is serious but not critical. > > All these files are declared as being strict XHTML (meaning strict > XML). > But they are not as you can see here: > https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://spdx.org/licenses/Glide.html > > -- > Cordially > Philippe Ombredanne > > +1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com > DejaCode : What's in your code?! at http://www.dejacode.com nexB Inc. > at http://www.nexb.com _______________________________________________ > Spdx mailing list > s...@lists.spdx.org > https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx _______________________________________________ Spdx-legal mailing list Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
