+1
SPDX is only pragmatically useful to me if it generally reflects the licenses
I’m likely to encounter when vetting community software.
Dave
From: Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org On Behalf Of Phil
Odence
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 5:12 AM
To: Michael Dolan ; J Lovejoy
Cc: SPDX-legal
Subject:
Hi spdx-legal,
I'm following up from a thread in linux-spdx[1] and a response to that
thread by Jilayne[2].
At this year's LLW in Barcelona, Max Mehl, Kate Stewart, Oliver Fendt,
Jeff McAffer and I got together to discuss some potential for
collaboration. Jeff brought up the idea of an
I agree we should err on the inclusive side. In concept, I think the driver
should be popularity more than OSS definition. It’s better for users to include
commonly used open source-like license. JSON and WTFPL (maybe this complies,
but it’s not on the OSI list anyway), for example. We do need
